Page:The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787 Volume 3.djvu/52

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
48
records of the federal convention
 

and confusion they derive their temporary consequence, and this they endeavor to prolong by debauching the minds of the common people, whose attention is wholly directed to the Abolition of debts both public & private. With these are associated the disaffected of every description, particularly those who were unfriendly during the war. Their paper money System, founded in oppression & fraud, they are determined to Support at every hazard. And rather than relinquish their favorite pursuit the trample upon the most sacred obligations. As a proof of this they refused to comply with a requisition of Congress for repealing all laws repugnant to the treaty of peace with Great Britain, and urged as their principal reason, that it would be calling in question the propriety of their former measures

These evils may be attributed, partly to the extreme freedom of our own constitution, and partly to the want of energy in the federal Union: And it is greatly to be apprehended that they cannot Speedily be removed but by uncommon and very serious exertions. It is fortunate however that the wealth and resources of this State are chiefly in possion of the well Affected, & that they are intirely devoted to the public good.

I have the honor of being Sir,

with the greatest Veneration & esteem,
Your excellencys very obedient &
most humble servant—

His excellency

Genl Washington

[Endorsed:]
No 6.
Letter to General Washington dated Newport June 18. 1787.


XLVI. Nathan Dane to Rufus King[1]

[New York], June 19th.

I fully agree to the propriety of the Convention order restraining its members from communicating its doings, tho’ I feel a strong desire and curiosity to know how it proceeds. I think the public never ought to see anything but the final report of the Convention—the digested result only, of their deliberations and enquiries.

Whether the plans of the Southern, Eastern or Middle States succeed, never, in my opinion, ought to be known. A few reflections on the subject lead me to doubt whether one of your members, Mr. P.,[2] who two or three days since came to this city, fully under-

  1. C.R. King, Life and Correspondence of Rufus King, I, 225.
  2. Probably William Pierce of Georgia, see Appendix B.