Page:The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus, Volume I.pdf/182

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
166
ARCHIBALD
[1902


In W. E. Crum, Short Texts from Coptic Oslraca and Papyri, Oxford, 1921. number 442 (p. 115) is a transcription, without translation, of a 11 line pottery tablet in the Manchester University Museum. It appears to be a table of numbers, the total of which in each of the first seven lines is equal to 17; but the purpose is obscure. The number in the Museum catalogue is 6221.

Schak-Schackenburg, H., "Das kleinere Fragment des Berliner Papyrus 6619," Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache . . ., vol. 40, 1902, pp. 65-66.

Compare under 1900 for an account of the larger fragment. We have here a problem similar to that in the larger fragment, and leading to the equations x2 + y2 = 400, x :y = 2 : 1½. The facsimile of the smaller fragment is given on the same plate as that containing the larger.

Tropfke, J., Geschichte der Elementar-Mathematik, Leipzig, 2 vols., 1902-1903.

Very numerous references in the index under: "Ägyptische Geometrie," "Ägyptisches Rechnen," and "Ahmes."

Zweite verbesserte und sehr vermehrte Auflage, Berlin and Leipzig, vol. 1, 1921, pp. 89-90, 94, 118-120, 171—172; vol. 2, 1921, pp. 8, 104, 134; vol. 3, 1922, pp. 20-24, 27, 111, 119; vol. 4, 1923, pp- 3. 4. 10. I4. 61. 64. 78. 79. 83. 94. 99. 127. 154-155. 181. 195. 211, 215; vol. 5, 1923, pp. 4, 11, 23; vol. 6, 1924, pp. 3, 4, 15; vol. 7, 1924, pp. 3, 4, 20.

1903

Calice, F. v., "Zur Böschungsbestimmung im Pap. Rhind," Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache' . . . , Vol.40, 1903, p. 147.

An interpretation of problem 60, of the Rhind papyrus, without emendation of the text; refers to Borchardt (1893). This note was corrected in Schack-Schackenburg (1904, 1).

Fazzari, G., "Breve storia dell' aritmetica e dell' algebra nei tempi antichi," Il Pitagora, vol. 10, Nov., 1903, pp. 14-19.

These pages in a series of articles, deal with "Aritmetica ed algebra presso gli Egiziani;" there are references to Eisenlohr (1877, 1891), Sylvester (1880), Loria (1892, 1893, 1894), and Baillet (1892). Practically the same material is given in Chapter II, pp. 17-25, of G. Fazzari, Brave Storia della Matematica dai Tempi Antichi al Media-e-vo, Milano, [1907].

Not important in this connection.