This page has been validated.
CONTENTS
xvii
PAGE
§ 190.The Russian Thinkers are epistemological Passivists, adverse to Criticism regarded as subjectivist Activism; they reject Subjectivism as Solipsism |
472 |
§ 191.Bělinskii's ethical Analysis of extreme Subjectivism and Objectivism; Crime and Superstition (Myth).—Solipsism as ethical and metaphysical Isolation; Murder or Suicide as a Consequence of Solipsism? (Bakunin, Bělinskii, Dostoevskii, Mihailovskii) |
473 |
§ 192.The ethical Imperative plays a Part in Russian Philosophy despite Empiricism and Utilitarianism; Russian Philosophy, too, is a moral Outlook on the World.—Ethics versus Historicism |
474 |
Chapter Twenty-Three: The Religious Problem of Russian Philosophy.
I.
§ 193.The Analysis of Religion in Russian Philosophy |
477 |
§ 194.The religious Disunion of Russia; ecclesiastical Religion and the rationalistic Philosophy of the Enlightenment; Nihilism and its Negation of Religion in general.—Atheism and Materialism.—Russia's sudden and unbridged Acquaintance with the European Philosophy of the Enlightenment; Feuerbach.—Moral and pathological Consequences; the Problem of Murder and Suicide in Russian Philosophy |
481 |
II.
§ 195.Nature and Defects of Orthodoxy; Passivism and Stationarism. (Byzantinism) |
487 |
III.
§ 196.Development of Theocracy in the three leading Christian Churches.—Comparative Considerations.—The Reformation and modern Changes in our Outlook on Life and the Universe.—Attempts at the Separation of Church and State; the historic Process of Disestablishment.—The Anti-ecclesiasticism of Catholic Countries is especially radical |
491 |
IV.
§ 197.Christianity and Christian Passivism favour the development of Theocracy |
497 |
V.
§ 198.Historico-philosophical Significance of the three leading Christian Churches, and the Development of the antitheocratic and antireligious Radicalism of Russian Philosophy |
500 |
1*
VOL. II.