them to a more just conduct, have been and will be
ineflFectual/' wrote Oliver Wolcott. "I hope, there-
fore, however disagreeable it may be to imply an error
of judgment in the President in appointing Mr. Rut-
ledge, that he will not be confirmed in his oflSce/* ^
Moreover, before the Senate convened on December 16,
1795, another ground for rejection of the nomination
had arisen, when it became generally known that Rut-
ledge was suffering from intermittent attacks of mental
derangement which might interfere with the perform-
ance of his judicial duties. Referring to this pos-
sibility, Alexander Hamilton wrote to Rufus King,
Senator from New York, who had asked advice on the
question of confirmation : ^'It is now, and, in certain
probable events, will still more be of infinite consequence
that our Judiciary should be well composed,'* and he ad-
vised careful inquiry as to Rutledge's qualifications,
saying: "The subject is truly a perplexing one; my
mind has several times fluctuated. If there was noth-
ing in the case but his imprudent sally upon a certain
occasion, I should think the reasons for letting him pass
would outweigh those for opposing his passage. But
if it be really true that he is sottish, or that his mind is
otherwise deranged, or that he has exposed himself
by improper conduct in pecuniary transactions, the
bias of my judgment would be to negative. And as
to the fact, I would satisfy myself by careful inquiry of
persons of character who may have had an oppor-
tunity of knowing.*' *
^ AdminiHraHon qf Woikington and Adams (1846)» by George Gibbs* I* letter of Nov. «3. 1795.
' Hamiiion, X. letter of Dec. 14, 1705. As early as Aug. 4, 1705, Attomeyt-Genenl Bradford had written to Alexander Hamilton that Rutledge*s mind was disordered. The Farmer's Weekly Museum, Feb. 2, 1796, stated that a letter to Philadelphia from a gentleman in Charleston, Dec. SI, 1795, stated that Rutledge, on Dec. 80, attempted to drown himself : ^ It is said he has discovered symptoms of derangement for some weeks past."
