Page:The Supreme Court in United States History vol 1.djvu/532

This page needs to be proofread.
500
THE SUPREME COURT


While the fears of the opponents of a consolidated form of government had been somewhat allayed by the adoption of the Constitution in its final form, specifically and expressly delegating the powers of Congress in definite terms, there still remained a grave anxiety over the indeterminate language contained in that clause which vested Congress with power "to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Oficer thereof"[1] Though this clause had occasioned no debate in the Federal Convention,[2] it was received with much misgiving in the various State conventions, and predictions were rife that it would be used as a weapon against the sovereignty of the States. With the initiation of the new Government in 1789, the broad or narrow interpretation of this clause marked a line of division between schools of political thought and action; and it has been truly said that "the history of the United States is in a large measure a history of the arguments which sought to enlarge or restrict its import"[3] As early as 1791, those who feared lest the powers of the Federal Government should be expanded, at the expense of the States, by legislative practice or by judicial interpretation, saw their fears confirmed, when Congress, without any express power vested by the Constitution,

    of general necessity and utility to all the States, as cannot come within the jurisdiction of any particular State, or to which the authority of any particular State is not competent, so that each particular State shall enjoy all sovereignty and supreme authority to all intents and purposes, excepting only those high authorities and powers by them delegated to Congress, for the purposes of the general Union. . . .

  1. Constitution, Article I, Section 8, paragraph 18.
  2. It was reported by Mr. Rutledge for the Committee of Detail, Aug. 8, adopted in Convention, Aug. 20, and reported in its final form by the Committee on Style and Arrangement, Sept. 12, 1787. See Documentary History of the Constitution (1900), III.
  3. The American Commonwealth (1888), by James Bryce, I. 870.