Page:The Zoologist, 4th series, vol 5 (1901).djvu/260

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
236
THE ZOOLOGIST

respecting the weight of different animals. Enquiries were therefore addressed to one of the leading experts on this subject, Mr. Carl Hagenbeck, of Hamburg, by whose courtesy the following data were contributed. The average weight of adult individuals of the subjoined species and varieties of animals is as follows:—

Lions (male)
(Female Lions are somewhat
less in weight.)
150–180 kilo (330 to 396 lb.)
Tigers, Indian and Siberian 100–150 kilo (220 to 380 lb.)
Bears, Asiatic, e.g. Thibet Bears 80–120 kilo (166 to 264 lb.)
Bears, Russian and Caucasian 100–170 kilo (220 to 374 lb.)
Bears, American (Grizzly) 150–225 kilo (330 to 495 lb.)
Wolves, Russian and American 30–55 kilo (66 to 121 lb.)
Foxes, European 5–8 kilo (11 to 17 lb.)

According to these data the certain lethal doses for the internal application of strychnia nitrate are, in round figures, as follows: —

For Lions 0·7 grm. (10½ gr.)
For Tigers 0·6 grm. (10 gr.)
For Bears (Asiatic) 0·5 grm. (7½ gr.)
For Bears (Russian and Caucasian) 0·7 grm. (10½ gr.)
For Bears (American) 0·9 grm. (14 gr.)
For Wolves 0·25 grm. (4 gr.)
For Foxes 0·035 grm. (⅓ gr.)

The lethal doses suitable for birds of prey may be calculated from a table which I. Schneider[1] has recently compiled for a few domesticated birds. According to this table the internal lethal doses per kilo (2i lb.) are as follows:—

For Geese 2·3–3·0 mgr. (125 to 120 gr.)
of strychniæ nitras.
For Ducks 3·0–4·5 mgr. (120 to 115 gr.)
For Fowls (which exhibit a remark-
able capacity for resisting the ac-
tion of the poison)
30–140 mgr. (12 to 2+16 gr.)
For Pigeons 8·5–11·0 mgr. (18 to 16 gr.)

The corresponding experiments showed that it was immaterial both with regard to the intensity of the action and the time required for the fatal issue whether the preparation was given as an aqueous solution, or whether the birds were fed with strychnia wheat.

In the general interest it may be mentioned that, as pointed out by

  1. 'Monatsschr. f. prakt. Thierheilk.,' by Fröhner and Kitt., vol. xi. No. 6, p. 245.