debts which they no longer owed.[1] The existence of such frauds was patent even to the exalted perceptions of the Court; and hence Anastasius, in order to render his abolition of the chrysargyron effective, resorted to an artifice which appealed to the avarice of his financial delegates throughout the country.[2] But an emperor, however well-intentioned, could rarely attempt to lighten the burdens of even the humblest of his subjects. His immediate ministers had sold the chief posts in the provinces[3] and were under a tacit convention to shield their nominees unless in the case of some rash and flagrant delinquent who abandoned all discretion. The public good was ignored in practice; to keep the treasury full was the simple and narrow policy of the Byzantine financier, who never fostered any enlightened measure for making the Empire rich.[4] Zeno essayed to remedy the widespread evil of venality, but his effort was futile; although his constitution was re-enacted more than once and permanently adorned the statute-book.[5] According
- [Footnote: proud to show the weals they had suffered sooner than pay; Ammianus,
xxii, 6, 16.]
- ↑ Cod. Theod., XI, xxviii, 10, 14; cf. vii, 20.
- ↑ Evagrius, iii, 39. He pretended to have made a sad mistake, and spread a report that he would promptly reimpose it were he not without documentary evidence to enable the books to be reopened. Enticed by this ruse the knavish collectors brought in the accounts they had kept back and a second conflagration was made with them.
- ↑ Under Arcadius the traffic was barefaced by Eutropius, and probably
little less so in the succeeding reign by Chrysaphius:
Vestibulo pretiis distinguit regula gentes.
Tot Galatae, tot Pontus, eat, tot Lydia nummis.
Si Lyciam tenuisse velis, tot millia ponas, etc.
Claudian, In Eutropium, i, 202.Afterwards it was more underhand; see Novel. viii.
- ↑ As Bury well observes; Gibbon, v, p. 533.
- ↑ Cod., I, xlviii.
