Page:The age of Justinian and Theodora (Volume 2).djvu/27

This page needs to be proofread.

water was used very charily, and it was sinful to take a bath.[1] The vegetable productions of the earth were viewed with profound admiration, wherefore the cultivation of gardens and parks was among the greatest delights of the Persians.[2] The estimation in which cattle were held was the cause of some singular legislation and ritual enactments. Thus the urine of the cow was habitually collected and made use of daily for the purification of the body by washing.[3] The sheep-dog was an object of extreme solicitude, so much so that the penalty exacted for manslaughter was only half as onerous as that inflicted for the crime of giving bad food to such a precious animal,[4] but even the latter was a mild offence compared with the infamy of killing a water-dog, the name by which the otter was identified, as the wretch convicted was sentenced to be beaten to death.[5] On the other hand, noxious animals were regarded as the creation of Angra-Mainyu, and the Magi made it a religious duty to kill them with their own hands, especially ants, serpents,

  • [Footnote: (Rawlinson, etc.), the Parthians were pious Mazdeites, as Darmsteter

has shown. Thus, when Tiridates visited Nero, he and his retinue, including several priests, journeyed overland to avoid defiling the sea; Justin, xli; Pliny, Hist. Nat., xxx, 17.]

  1. One Shah, Balâsh, was, in fact, dethroned by the Mohbeds (Magi) for having erected public bath-houses; Jos. Stylites, op. cit. (Wright).
  2. Xenophon, Oeconom., iv, 13; Xerxes, on his way to Greece, arriving at a handsome plane tree, adorned it with jewels of gold, and left one of his personal guards as a custodian of it; Herodotus, vii, 31.
  3. The Bareshnûm, or great ceremony of purification, lasted nine days and consisted chiefly in the systematic application of nirung or gomez (urine of kine) to different parts of the body; see West's translation of the rubric, Sacr. Bks. of the East, xviii, 431.
  4. Vendidâd, xiii, 24 (63). The manslaughterer got off with sixty stripes, but the bad feeder became a peshotanu and received two hundred, the maximum, it seems, actually inflicted.
  5. Ibid., xiv, 1; iv, 40 (106).