“I merely spoke of you,” replied Farrar, coolly, and he has gone around to your office. He knows about Parks, and if he wants him he’ll probably take him. It all depends upon how you strike Cooke whether you get the case or not. I have never told you about him,” he added with some hesitation; “he’s a trifle queer, but a good fellow at the bottom. I should hate to see him lose his land.”
“How is the railroad mixed up in it?” I asked.
“I don’t know much about law, but it would seem as if they had a pretty strong case,” he answered. He went on to tell me what he knew of the matter in his clean, pithy sentences, often brutally cynical, as though he had not a spark of interest in any of it. Mr. Cooke’s claim to the land came from a maternal great-uncle, long since deceased, who had been a settler in these regions. The railroad answered that they had bought the land with other properties from the man, also deceased, to whom the old gentleman was alleged to have sold it. Incidentally I learned something of Mr. Cooke’s maternal ancestry.
