tinue the controversy born of the antagonism. The true Church always has believed, and always will believe, in an inerrant Word of God, and she cannot harbor within her ranks any group of people, no matter by what name they go, who do not take their stand without equivocation on that same ground.
If reason for this intolerance is asked, it will appear in the light of some questions asked by Dr. Joseph Parker. These questions are:
- If the Bible is wrong in history, what guarantee is there that it is right in morals?
- If the Bible is not a reliable guide in facts, how do we know that it is a trustworthy guide in doctrine?
However he may have arrived at his conclusions, it is extremely significant, in the light of these questions, that Dr. E. D. Burton, being willing to admit that the Bible is
- not infallible in history or in matters of science,
has also concluded that it is
- not wholly consistent and therefore not ultimately and as a whole inerrant in the field of morals and religion
What reason more can the Church want to justify her for intolerance of a theory that will do this to a man's faith? Is it not correct reasoning to conclude that if one man suffers such a collapse of faith after accepting evolution, others are likely to suffer the same thing? And when the Church observes this
