Page:The problem of China - Russell 1922.pdf/35

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
33
THE PROBLEM OF CHINA
33
(Ministry of Interior) in 1910, the results of which are embodied in a report submitted to the Department of State at Washington by Mr. Raymond P. Tenney, a Student Interpreter at the U.S. Legation, Peking…. It is pointed out that even this census can only be regarded as approximate, as, with few exceptions, households and not individuals were counted.

The estimated population of the Chinese Empire (exclusive of Tibet) is given, on the basis of this census, as 329,542,000, while the population of Tibet is estimated at 1,500,000. Estimates which have been made at various other dates are given as follows (p. 2):—

A.D. A.D.
1381 59,850,000 1760 143,125,225
1412 65,377,000 203,916,477
1580 60,692,000 1761 205,293,053
1662 21,068,000 1762 198,214,553
1668 25,386,209 1790 155,249,897
1710 23,312,200 1792 307,467,200
27,241,129 333,000,000
1711 28,241,129 1812 362,467,183
1736 125,046,245 360,440,000
1743 157,343,975 1842 413,021,000
149,332,730 1868 404,946,514
150,265,475 1881 380,000,000
1753 103,050,600 1882 381,309,000
1885 377,636,000

These figures suffice to show how little is known about the population of China. Not only are widely divergent estimates made in the same year (e.g. 1760), but in other respects the figures are incredible. Mr. Putnam Weale might contend that the drop from 60 millions in 1580 to 21 millions in 1662 was due to the wars leading to the Manchu conquest. But no one can believe that between 1711 and 1736 the