80
that we become more firnily established in oiir
lUMrtjt and in a sted&st and vigwous re8ola«»
tion^ in dependence^ personally^ upon divine
grace and a &voahng Providence, to guard
a§iinat; and remst to the utmost^ every attempt,
of every kind, to reinstate a corrupt and tyran-*
nical diurek in power, of vhich she knows but
one use — a church, (and in that we compre-
hend ibfi court with which she is inseparably
united,) which, for her heresies, barbarities, blas-
phemy, and pollution, shameless and avowed,
almost deserves, in allusion to her own arrogant
assmnption, and with the vanation which truth
requires, to be regarded as a church — if a
church at all, and not rather a congregation
of malignants — Inira c^uam nemo salvus esse
potest
The blot upon tiie British Statute book, the
Anti-christian bill of 1829, was made a law of
the realm, April 13th of that year. But it was
necessary ! Who made it so ? What proof
was produced, or is producible, that it was so ?
And if so, what then ? With the knowledge
I 2
