This page has been validated.
iv
CONTENTS.
PAGE | ||
Detailed Study of great Men | 40 | |
Neander and his History | 41 | |
Distinction of Characters | 42 | |
Uses of this Method:— | ||
I. Gradation of Importance in Ecclesiastical Matters | 44 | |
II. Combination of Civil and Ecclesiastical History | 45 | |
III. Caution against Partiality | 46 | |
IV. Reference to Original Authorities | 48 | |
Graves of the Covenanters | 50 | |
The Catacombs | 51 | |
Special Opportunities for this Study:— | ||
I. In the Church of England | 52 | |
II. In the University of Oxford | 54 | |
III. In active Clerical Life | 56 | |
Conclusion | 59 | |
LECTURE III.— THE ADVANTAGES OF ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY. | ||
I. | Importance of Historical Facts in Theological Study | 62 |
II. | Importance of a General View of Ecclesiastical History | 65 |
III. | Use of the Biography of good Men | 67 |
IV. | Use of the general Authority of the Church | 69 |
V. | Better Understanding of Differences and of Unity | 72 |
VI. | Evidence rendered to the Truth of Christianity | 74 |
VII. | Lessons from the Failings of the Church | 75 |
VIII. | Comparison of Ecclesiastical History with the Scriptures | 76 |
IX. | Future Prospect of the History of the Church | 80 |
Indications in History | 81 | |
Indications in Scripture | 82 | |
Conclusion | 85 |