This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
INFANTILE RECURRENCE OF TOTEMISM
199

same totem.[1] Andrew Lang, who here agrees with Durkheim, goes so far as to believe that the blood taboo was not necessary to bring about the prohibition in regard to the women of the same tribe.[2] The general totem taboo which, for instance, forbids any one to sit in the shadow of the totem tree, would have sufficed. Andrew Lang also contends for another derivation of exogamy (see below) and leaves it in doubt how these two explanations are related to each other.

As regards the temporal relations, the majority of authors subscribe to the opinion that totemism is the older institution and that exogamy came later.[3]

Among the theories which seek to explain exogamy independently of totemism only a few need be mentioned in so far as they illustrate different attitudes of the authors towards the problem of incest.

MacLennan[4] had ingeniously guessed that exogamy resulted from the remnants of customs pointing to earlier forms of female rape. He assumed that it was the general custom in an-

  1. See Frazer’s “Criticism of Durkheim, Totemism and Exogamy,” p. 101.
  2. “Secret,” etc., p. 125.
  3. See Frazer, 1. c. IV, p. 75: “The totemic clan is a totallydifferent social organism from the exogamous class, and we have good grounds for thinking that it is far older.”
  4. “Primitive Marriage,” 1865.