UNCLASSIFIED
- them and are satisfied with their qualifications and suitability for what are clearly unusual measures that are lawful only when practiced correctly by personnel whose records clearly demonstrate their suitability for that role. The vetting process will not be that dissimilar from the checks that are provided by the OIG, OS, etc. in certain cases before individuals are promoted or receive awards, and the selection and training of aggressive interrogators certainly warrants a similar vetting process."[1]
(TS// //NF) The chief of CTC, Jose Rodriguez, objected to this approach, stating;
- "I do not think that CTC/LGL should or would want to get into the business of vetting participants, observers, instructors or others that are involved in this program. It is simply not your job. Your job is to tell all what are the acceptable legal standards for conducting interrogations per the authorities obtained from Justice and agreed upon by the White House."[2]
(TS// //NF) Contrary to statements later made by CIA Director Michael Hayden and other CIA officials that "[a]ll those involved in the questioning of detainees are carefully chosen and screened for demonstrated professional judgment and maturity,"[3] CIA records suggest that the vetting sought by did not take place. The Committee reviewed CIA records related to several CIA officers and contractors involved in the CIA's Detention and Interrogation Program, most of whom conducted interrogations. The Committee identified a number of personnel whose backgrounds include notable derogatory information calling into question their eligibility for employment, their access to classified information, and their participation in CIA interrogation activities. In nearly all cases, the derogatory information was known to the CIA prior to the assignment of the CIA officers to the Detention and Interrogation Program. This group of officers included individuals who, among other issues, had engaged in inappropriate detainee interrogations, had workplace anger management issues, and had reportedly admitted to sexual assault.[4]
- 7. Bureau of Prisons "WOW'ed" by Level of Deprivation at CIA's COBALT Detention Site
(TS// //NF) In December 2002, the CIA's Renditions Group sent a team of recently trained interrogators to DETENTION SITE COBALT to engage in interrogations. The
interrogation plans proposed by that team for at least three detainees at DETENTION SITE
- ↑ Email from: , CTC/LGL; to: [REDACTED]; cc: Jose Rodriguez, [REDACTED], [REDACTED], ; subject: EYES ONLY; date: November , 2002, at 03:13:01 PM.
- ↑ Email from: Jose Rodriguez; to: , CTC/LGL; cc: [REDACTED], [REDACTED], [REDACTED], [REDACTED], ; subject: EYES ONLY; date: November , 2002, at 04:27 PM.
- ↑ Transcript of hearing, April 12, 2007 (DTS #2007-1563).
- ↑ The information is described at length in the Committee Study in Volume III.
Page 59 of 499
UNCLASSIFIED
