CF?TRAL R. R. CO. ?. JERSEY CITY. 209 U. 8o Arg?rne?t for Plaintiff in Error. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY v.. JERSEY CITY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF ERROR8 AND APPEALS OF ? STATE OF NEW JERSEY. No. 2G3. Ar?ed A?Ffi 15. 1?, lg?.--Dee?d Ap? ?7, 1008. ?J?" ? ?y ? ? ? ? 8? ? s ?m ? ? ? "?ve?ty.*' U? ? ?t of 1? ? ?e 8? of New York ?d New o? ? ? of ? H ? ?v? ? of ? ? ?e ? by ?ty ? N? Je?y ?d t? ju?n ?ven ? New Yo? over ? warm ? ?t ?u& ?e ?ve? ?wer ? NeW Je? ? ? m& ?r ? ? e? of ?t ?r dep?ve t? o?er of t? ? of ? ?y ?t?ut d? p? of ?w. ? ? ? ? a ?mp?t ?tw?n S? will h? ? ?ch a ? ?e?t from t?t ? ? the ?t ?u? of ?th S?. ? f? ? ? .m ? op?on. 'M?. Fra? B? ?d Mr. W?m D. Ed?, ? whom Mr. G?e Hol? w? on the b?ef, for p?n? ? e?or: ?or ? ?e execution of the comp?t New Je?y did not ?ve j?ction for ?y p? over the l?d ?der the warm of Hudson ?ver ?d New York ?y ?d ? no ju? dic?on now ?1ow 1ow-wa?r ?k of ?e ?ver ?d ?y ? over ?e pro?y of the pl?t? ? e?r ex?pt that ?nfe? by the compact. C? v. C?ell, 4 W?. C. C. R. 371, ci? ?d approved ? S? v. Da?, 25 N.J. ?w, 387; Ha? U.S. I, 13; Martin v. W?, 16 Pet. 345; H?s? B?e Co. v. H?s? C?ty, 173 U.S. 592. By the compact exclusive juri?iction w? gran? or con- ? ? New. York over the land of the plaintiff ? e?or, su?
�
