106 STAT. 4690 PUBLIC LAW 102-575—OCT. 30, 1992 (October 1990 price levels) plus or minus such amounts, if any, as may be required by reason of ordinary fluctuations in construction costs as indicated by engineering cost indexes applicable to the type of construction involved herein". TITLE XXVn—MONTANA niRIGATION PROJECTS SEC. 2701. PICK-SLOAN PROJECT PUMPING POWER. (a) The Secretary of the Interior, in cooperation with the Secretary of Energy, shall make available, as soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, project punu>ing power from the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (authorized by section 9 of the Act entitled An Act authorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other purposes" approved December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 891) (commonly known as the Tlood Control Act of 1944") to two existing non- Federal irrigation projects known as the— (1) Haidle Irrigation Project, Prairie County, Montana; and (2) Hammond Irrigation District, Rosebud County, Montana. Provided, That the two districts are determined by the Secretary of Energy to be public agencies, as that term is used in section 9(c) of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939, 43 U.S.C. section 485h(c). (b) Power made available under this section shall be at the firm power rate. Reclamation TITLE XXVIII—RECLAMATION RECREATION S^ement MANAGEMENT ACT Act of 1992. 16 USC 460/-31 SEC. 2801. SHORT TITLE. This title may be cited as the lleclamation Recreation Management Act of 1992. note. 16 USC 460Z-31. SEC. 2802. FINDINGS. The Congress finds and declares the following: (1) There is a Federal responsibility to provide opportunities for public recreation at Federal water projects. (2) Some provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act are outdated becaiise of increases in demand for outdoor recreation and changes in the economic climate for recreation managing entities. (3) Provisions of such Act relating to non-Federal responsibility for all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities result in an unfair burden, especially in cases where the facilities are old or underdesigned. (4) Provisions of such Act that limit the Federal share of recreation facility development at water projects completed before 1965 to $100,000 preclude a responsible Federal share in providing adequate opportunities for safe outdoor recreation. (5) There should be Federal authority to expand existing recreation facilities to meet jpublic demand, in partnership with non-Federal interests. (6) Nothing in this title changes the responsibility of the Bureau to meet the purposes for which Federal Reclamation projects were initially authorized and constructed.
�
