PUBLIC LAW 110–114—NOV. 8, 2007
121 STAT. 1073
‘‘(i) be responsible for providing all necessary lands, easements, relocations, and rights-of-way associated with the facility; and ‘‘(ii) receive credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project with respect to which the agreement is being entered into for those items.’’; and (3) in paragraphs (1) and (2)(A) of subsection (d) (as redesignated by paragraph (1))— (A) by inserting ‘‘and maintenance’’ after ‘‘operation’’ each place it appears; and (B) by inserting ‘‘processing, treatment, contaminant reduction, or’’ after ‘‘dredged material’’ the first place it appears in each of those paragraphs. SEC. 2006. REMOTE AND SUBSISTENCE HARBORS.
33 USC 2242.
(a) IN GENERAL.—In conducting a study of harbor and navigation improvements, the Secretary may recommend a project without the need to demonstrate that the project is justified solely by national economic development benefits if the Secretary determines that— (1)(A) the community to be served by the project is at least 70 miles from the nearest surface accessible commercial port and has no direct rail or highway link to another community served by a surface accessible port or harbor; or (B) the project would be located in the State of Hawaii, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the United States Virgin Islands, or American Samoa; (2) the harbor is economically critical such that over 80 percent of the goods transported through the harbor would be consumed within the community served by the harbor and navigation improvement; and (3) the long-term viability of the community would be threatened without the harbor and navigation improvement. (b) JUSTIFICATION.—In considering whether to recommend a project under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider the benefits of the project to— (1) public health and safety of the local community, including access to facilities designed to protect public health and safety; (2) access to natural resources for subsistence purposes; (3) local and regional economic opportunities; (4) welfare of the local population; and (5) social and cultural value to the community. SEC. 2007. USE OF OTHER FEDERAL FUNDS.
33 USC 2222.
The non-Federal interest for a water resources study or project may use, and the Secretary shall accept, funds provided by a Federal agency under any other Federal program, to satisfy, in whole or in part, the non-Federal share of the cost of the study or project if the Federal agency that provides the funds determines that the funds are authorized to be used to carry out the study or project. SEC. 2008. REVISION OF PROJECT PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT; COST SHARING.
33 USC 2340.
dkrause on GSDDPC44 with PUBLAW
(a) FEDERAL ALLOCATION.—Upon authorization by law of an increase in the maximum amount of Federal funds that may be
VerDate Aug 31 2005
13:52 Jan 23, 2009
Jkt 059194
PO 00001
Frm 01071
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
M:\STATUTES\2007\59194PT1.001
APPS10
PsN: 59194PT1
�
