Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 121.djvu/1229

This page needs to be proofread.
[121 STAT. 1208]
[121 STAT. 1208]
PUBLIC LAW 110-000—MMMM. DD, 2007

121 STAT. 1208

PUBLIC LAW 110–114—NOV. 8, 2007

approximately 5.34 acres of dry land levee beginning at a point N. 2203542.3167, E. 6310930.1385, thence running west about 59.99 feet to a point N. 2203544.6562, E. 6310870.1468, thence running south about 3,874.99 feet to a point N. 2199669.8760, E. 6310861.7956, thence running east about 60.00 feet to a point N. 2199668.8026, E. 6310921.7900, thence running north about 3,873.73 feet to the point of origin. (c) COST SHARING.—The non-Federal share of the cost of reconstructing and relocating the portion of the project described in subsection (b)(2) shall be 100 percent. SEC. 5041. CAMBRIA, CALIFORNIA. 106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335.

Section 219(f)(48) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A–220) is amended— (1) by striking ‘‘$10,300,000’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—$10,300,000’’; (2) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘(B) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d–5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project not to exceed $3,000,000 for the cost of planning and design work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the partnership agreement for the project.’’; and (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with subparagraph (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section). SEC. 5042. CONTRA COSTA CANAL, OAKLEY AND KNIGHTSEN, CALIFORNIA; MALLARD SLOUGH, PITTSBURG, CALIFORNIA.

Sections 512 and 514 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2650) are each amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘All planning, study, design, and construction on the project shall be carried out by the office of the district engineer, San Francisco, California.’’. SEC. 5043. DANA POINT HARBOR, CALIFORNIA.

Study.

The Secretary shall conduct a study of the causes of water quality degradation within Dana Point Harbor, California, to determine if the degradation is the result of a Federal navigation project, and, if the Secretary determines that the degradation is the result of a Federal navigation project, the Secretary shall carry out a project to mitigate the degradation at Federal expense. SEC. 5044. EAST SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

dkrause on GSDDPC44 with PUBLAW

106 Stat. 4835.

VerDate Aug 31 2005

13:52 Jan 23, 2009

Section 219(f)(22) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (113 Stat. 336) is amended— (1) by striking ‘‘$25,000,000’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—$25,000,000’’; (2) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘(B) CREDIT.—The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d–5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of design and construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the partnership agreement for the project. ‘‘(C) IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS.—The non-Federal interest may provide any portion of the non-Federal share

Jkt 059194

PO 00001

Frm 01206

Fmt 6580

Sfmt 6581

M:\STATUTES\2007\59194PT1.001

APPS10

PsN: 59194PT1