Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 25.djvu/641

FIFTIETH CONGRESS. Sess. I. Ch. 1210. 1888. 595 Catharine S. Van Hovenburg, administratrix of John Van Hoven- C,·;VdSm€¤tS~C°m°f burg, deceased, nine hundred and forty-three dollars and eighty-one lm°`C°mm`m’ cents: J. Phelps Adams executor of Henry S. Davids, deceased, nine thopsand seven hundred and sixty-four dollars and seventy-four cen s; Ezra J . Whittaker, eight thousand two hundred and one dollars and ninety-two cents; Emiline Gragg, executrix of Samuel Gragg, deceased, two hundred and ;fifty-five dollars and fifty-eight cents: John K. Winn, fourteen dollars and thirty cents; James E. Reed, four hundred and fifteen dollars and fifty cents; Charles B. Faris, one hundred and fifty-seven dollars; James E. Hagood, one hundred and eighty-four dollars; James Conlin and John C. Roberts, under the firm name of Conlin and Roberts, nine hundred and eighty-o11e dollars and eight cents; Daniel B. Hinckley, James Spiers, and Daniel E. Hayes, under the firm name of Hinckley, Spiers, and Hayes, seven hundred and four dollars and thirty-six cents; The Remillard Brick Com any, two thousand three hundred and thirty-Eve dollars and sixty=1Ive cents; Bennett Fulmer, fifteen dollars; Harr H. Bodwell, one thousand four hundred and forty-nine dollars and fifty-four cents; Edward T. Strong, one hundred and eleven dollars and twenty cents; C. Mark Cole, four thousand and ninety-seven dollars; Sarah M. Burge, administrator of Young Burge, deceased, nve hundred and seventy-six dollars and ninety-nine cents; The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, one hundred and forty-four thousand and ninety-two dollars and ninety- two cents; To pay difference of interest between five per centum as rovided A1b•¤r¢Gra¤¤. _ by section ten hundred and ninety, Revised Statutes, and) six per h5§"§‘,}Z’Q§s{Tf `”"h` centum under the act of March third, eighteen hundred and eighty- fi;§·~1S,$°·1°4‘_gQ~P·2°°~ five (eighteenth Statutes, page four hundred and eighty-one), on part V0l;23,_pIIt341.. of a judgment of the Court of Claims in favor of Albert Grant, withheld under the act of March third, eighteen hundred and eighty- five, but afterwards paid, the United States not having prevailed in the suits wherein demands were made against said Al ert Grant, two hundred and ninety-one dollars and thirty-eight cents: in all. four hundred and ninety thousand six hundred and ten dollars and ninety- eight cents; Proz·ide>d, That none of the ijudgments herein provided P>·<>vfsv. for shall be paid until the right of appea shall have expired. Ap*°°“l‘ FOX AND WISC()NSIN RIVER IMPROVEMENT. For payment of judgments and awards recovered against the United W§_¢;g¤;s<·SRF<>X and States for flowage damages caused by the improvement of the Fox prdvemeilst, mm 1m` and \rVisconsin Rivers, in the State of Wisconsin, and reiported to Congress by the Attorne -General in Senate Executive ocnment Number One Hundred andyEighty-one, Fiftieth Congress, first session, name} *2 U. IJ. Mihills, Eve hundred and forty dollars; Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, two thousand and forty-thr<~·e dollars and forty-five cents; First National Bank of Madison, two thousand and thirty-nine dollars six cents; C. H. Benton, one thousand and nineteen dollars and fifty-three cents; George E. Sutherland, six hundred and twenty-six dollars and eighty-nine cents _;