Page:United States v. $29,410.00.pdf/1

This page has been validated.

FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit

January 20, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. $29,410.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, more or less,

Defendant.

WALTER KEVIN MOORE, III, a/k/a Walter John Moore, III,

Claimant - Appellant.

No. 14-6101

(D.C. No. 5:13-CV-00132-D) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT^[1]

Before GORSUCH, O'BRIEN, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

In this in rem civil forfeiture of $29,410.00, Claimant Walter Kevin Moore, III asserted his ownership of the currency, which law enforcement officers found in a

↑ After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

[1] After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

[1]