Page:Unlawfulmarriage00jane.djvu/191

graphs, blood-kindred, to the exclusion of "affinity, or relationship by marriage." Neither the original Hebrew nor Greek terms will justify the assertion. Look at his proofs in the paragraphs. בָּשָׂר, as we have already seen, is a word of extensive signification. In Gen. 6:12, it means all mankind; and in Gen. 7:21, it signifies all animals as well as men. Simon, in his Lexicon, says it means relatives by blood and affinity. That the latter are embraced, see Judg. 9:2, and 2 Sam. 19:11, 12. The passages referred to by Omicron, use the Hebrew word שְׁאֵר for blood-kindred; but his comment on Num. 27:11, is not correct. He says, "This last passage in Numbers, is especially decisive; for it directs that the inheritance of land, in default of a son or other near heir to any person, shall go to the next of his 'kin;' שְׁאֵר, (she-er,) in his clan or division of his tribe, (not in his family, as in the English version.) But inheritance went only by blood, never by affinity; and in this very instance it passed over all the nearest relations by affinity, to go to a blood-kinsman, however remote. This word, then, did not of itself include even the nearest degrees of affinity."