high and have afforded material for a moral tale called "The Smuggler's Awful End," but there are no cherubs who watch over Customs or the Brussels Convention in West Africa and I have no intention of volunteering for such an appointment.
But to return to the Sierra Leone finances and the relationship which the expenditure of that colony bears to the revenue. The increase in the imports is apparently the thing depended on to justify the idea that as the trade has increased the governmental expenditure has a right to do so likewise. The imports increase in 1896 is given as £90,683. From this you must deduct for railway material, £26,000, and for the increased specie import, £19,591, which leaves you an increase of imports of £45,092 from 1887—896, and remember a good percentage of this remainder of £45,092 belongs to French Guinea.
Now the expenditure on the government of Sierra Leone has increased from £58,534 in 1887 to £116,183, being an increase at the rate of 991 per cent., whereas the exports during the same period have increased at the rate of 34.8 per cent., or from £333,157 to £449,033.
In other words, whereas in 1887 the government expenditure amounted to 17.5 per cent., the exports in 1896 amounted to 25.4 per cent. The sum of £40,579 of this increase is credited to police, gaols, transport, and public works;[1] and if this is to be the normal rate of
- ↑
£ Increase. Expenditure on police and gaols, 1896 31,504 £ Expenditure„ on police„ and gaols,„ 1887 3,037 28,467 Expenditure on transport . . . . . 1896 10,091 Expenditure„ on police„ and gaols,„ 1887 3,298 6,793 Expenditure on public works . . . . . 1896 6,736 Expenditure„ on police„ and gaols,„ 1887 1,417 5,319 Aggregate increase. . . . . 40,579
