have some mill on a high road. The Priory had only one mill originally at Selborne; but, by grants of lands, it came possessed of one at Durton, and one at Oakhanger, and probably some on it's other several manors[1]. The mill at the Priory was in use within the memory of man, and the ruins of the mill-house were standing within these thirty years: the pond and dam, and miller's dwelling, still remain. As the stream was apt to fail in very dry summers, the tenants found their situation very distressing, for want of water, and so were forced to abandon the spot. This inconvenience was probably never felt in old times, when the whole district was nothing but woodlands: and yet several centuries ago there seem to have been two or three mills between Well-head and the Priory. For the reason of this assertion, see Letter XXIX. to Mr. Barrington.
Occasional mention has been made of the many privileges and immunities enjoyed by the convent and it's priors; but a more particular state seems to be necessary. The author therefore thinks this the proper place, before he concludes these antiquities, to introduce all that has been collected by the judicious bishop Tanner, respecting the Priory and it's advantages, in his Notitia Monastica, a book now seldom seen, on account of the extravagance of it's price; and being but in few hands cannot be easily consulted[2]. He also adds a few of it's many privileges from other authorities:—the account is as follows. Tanner, page 166.
- ↑ Thomas Knowles, president, &c. ann. Hen. 8vi. xxiiiᵒ. [viz. 1532.] demised to J.Whitelie their mills, &c. for twenty years. Rent, xxiii s. iiii d.—Accepted Frewen, president, &c. ann. Caroli xv. [viz. 1640.] demised to Jo. Hook and Elizabeth, his wife, the said mills. Rent as above.
- ↑ A few days after this was written a new edition of this valuable work was announced, in the month of April of the year 1787, as published by Mr. Nasmith.
