A.H. 37.
the appointment of an umpire, what had they gained? It was a Theocracy they had been dreaming of, and now they were drifting back into the abuses of the past. The umpires would decide simply as between Muʿāwiya and ʿAlī; and, whatever the verdict, despotism would be riveted more firmly than ever upon them. What they really wanted had been lost sight of: nor was there any longer a prospect of its being won.
Draw off into hostile camp near Kūfa;Angrily arguing thus, a body of 12,000 men fell out from ʿAlī's army on their homeward march, but kept side by side with the rest, at some little distance off. Loud and violent in their speech, they beat about their neighbours in rude Bedawi fashion with their whips, and accused one another of having abandoned the cause of Islām into the hands of godless arbitrators; while others repented of their having betrayed the Caliph on the field of battle, and thus separated themselves from the great body of the Faithful. In this frame of mind they avoided Al-Kūfa, but encamped in its vicinity at the village of Ḥarūrā. Their leaders belonged to the tribes of Temīm, Bekr, and Hamdān in Al-Kūfa. They chose for themselves a temporary leader of the Azd tribe. Their war-cry was, "The decision belongs to God," that is, the question of the Caliph must be left to the arbitrament of the sword. Their resolve, however, was that, when they had gained ascendency, they would no longer have any Prince or Caliph at all, and vest the administration of affairs in a Council of State. Such theocratic dreams were not confined to these schismatics, but had widely leavened the factious and fanatic city Al-Kūfa itself.
ʿAlī, aware of the danger, sent his cousin, Ibn al-ʿAbbās, to reason with the seceding body, but to no effect. He then proceeded in person to their camp, and gained over their leader by the promise of the government of Ispahān.but persuaded by ʿAlī, He urged that, so far from being responsible for "the godless compromise," as they called the truce, he had been driven to it against his better judgment by their own wayward and persistent obstinacy; that the umpires were bound by its terms to deliver their decision in accordance with the sacred text, which the Theocrats equally with himself held to be the final guide; and if the umpires' deliverance should after all be in disregard of right, he would without hesitation
