Proceedings of the Royal Society of London/Volume 2/Additional Observations on the Optical Properties and Structure of heated Glass and unannealed glass Drops

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Volume 2
Additional Observations on the Optical Properties and Structure of heated Glass and unannealed glass Drops by David Brewster
2566387Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Volume 2 — Additional Observations on the Optical Properties and Structure of heated Glass and unannealed glass DropsDavid Brewster

Additional Observations on the optical Properties and Structure of heated Glass and unannealed glass Drops.By David Brewster, LL.D. F.R.S. Edin. and F.S.A. Edin. In a Letter addressed to the Right Hon. Sir Joseph Banks, Bart. K.B. P.R.S.Read November 10, 1814.[Phil Trans. 1815, p. 1.]

IN this continuation of the author's remarks on Rupert's drops, he observes, that when they are made of colourless glass, and are held before a sheet of white paper, even the unbroken drops exhibit some appearances which he considers as marks of a crystalline texture; and when they are broken in such a manner that the parts are retained in their relative situation, the structure shows a cleavage in the direction of lines diverging from the apex, or rather in the form of conical layers, having a common axis, with their apex towards the blunt end of the drop.

Since the surface of these drops is cooled suddenly by plunging into water, and fixed before the central parts are contracted, the author conceived that their specific gravity might be less than that of annealed drops; and indeed a difference was found upon trial, amounting to 1/45th part in the aggregate bulk of its external dimensions; but it appeared, on examination, that the contraction of the glass had taken place from within outwards, so as to leave cavities in the interior sufficient to account for the difference of weight, without supposing any intrinsic difference of density in the glass itself.

Dr. Brewster further observed, that by heating a drop to redness, and allowing it to cool gradually, these cavities disappeared entirely, so as to prove that they did not arise from included air, but merely from the internal contraction of the glass.

Since considerable difficulty occurs in preserving unannealed drops of flint glass, the author has paid attention to the circumstances most favourable to their preservation, and recommends removing them from the water in which they have been plunged, as soon as the redness in the centre of the drop ceases to be visible.

Since the smallest portion of any polarizing crystal polarizes or depolarizes light according to its position, the author expected to find the same property in the fragments of a broken drop, but upon trial they did not appear to possess this property.

Of the many important conclusions to which the author thinks that these experiments are calculated to conduct us, there is one which he considers too palpable to be passed over, namely, that when the particles of glass are separated to a certain distance by the expansive agency of heat, they assume a crystalline arrangement, which would not be discovered but by fixing them in this state by sudden cooling; since the gradual approximation of the particles, by slow cooling, entirely destroys the crystalline structure thus produced.

In a note the author remarks, that on more than one authority steel is said to be less dense after being hardened by quenching than before, which he ascribes, as in glass, to the sudden induration having commenced at the surface. And he takes occasion to suggest the possibility, that under these circumstances moderate changes of temperature may not occasion any degree of expansion, and that we may obtain, within certain limits, a substance of invariable length that may be useful for pendulums.