Royal Indemnity Company v. Cardillo/Opinion of the Court

889649Royal Indemnity Company v. Cardillo — Opinion of the Court

United States Supreme Court

302 U.S. 736

Royal Indemnity Company  v.  Cardillo


Mr. James E. McCabe, of Washington, D. C., for respondent Rennie.

Messrs. Stanley Reed, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., and Sam E. Whitaker, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Henry A. Julicher, of Washington, D. C., for respondent Frank A. Cardillo.

For opinion below, see Hoage v. Royal Ind. Co., 67 App.D.C. 142, 90 F.(2d) 387.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.

Notes edit

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse