Skinner v. Oklahoma

Syllabus

Skinner v. State of Oklahoma, Ex. Rel. Williamson, 316 U.S. 535 (w:1942), was the ruling which held that compulsory sterilization could not be sentenced as a punishment for a crime. Warning: template has been deprecated.

211103Skinner v. Oklahoma — Syllabus

Court Documents

Opinion of the Court

Concurring Opinions: Stone; Jackson

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

316 U.S. 535

SKINNER v. OKLAHOMA EX REL. WILLIAMSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL

June 1, 1942, Decided

1. A statute of Oklahoma provides for the sterilization, by vasectomy or salpingectomy, of "habitual criminals" — an habitual criminal being defined therein as any person who, having been convicted two or more times, in Oklahoma or in any other State, of "felonies involving moral turpitude," is thereafter convicted and sentenced to imprisonment in Oklahoma for such a crime. Expressly excepted from the terms of the statute are certain offenses, including embezzlement. As applied to one who was convicted once of stealing chickens and twice of robbery, held that the statute violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. P. 316 U. S. 537.

2. The State Supreme Court having sustained the Act, as applied to the petitioner here, without reference to a severability clause, the question whether that clause would be so applied as to remove the particular constitutional objection is one which may appropriately be left for adjudication by the state court. P. 316 U. S. 542.