Talk:Encyclopædia Britannica

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Koavf in topic High-rez copies

Existing transcriptions edit

There is already an online version of this publication. The biggest criticism that I have about it is that those who enterred the material failed to proofread the OCR material. Anyone who intends to upload this material should compare it with a print copy of the original. Eclecticology 22:01, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

  • Failed to proofread is an understatement: it appears to be raw OCR output. I think Project Gutenberg is working its way through the 1911 EB, but very slowly. -- Anon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.168.224.126 (talk) 2005-06-20T16:39:51

High-rez copies edit

https://data.nls.uk/data/digitised-collections/encyclopaedia-britannica/Justin (koavf)TCM 06:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply