The Philosophical Review/Volume 1/Summary: Gutberlet - Ueber Messbarkeit psychischer Akte

The Philosophical Review Volume 1 (1892)
edited by Jacob Gould Schurman
Summary: Gutberlet - Ueber Messbarkeit psychischer Akte by Anonymous
2658193The Philosophical Review Volume 1 — Summary: Gutberlet - Ueber Messbarkeit psychischer Akte1892Anonymous
Ueber Messbarkeit psychischer Acte. C. Gutberlet. Phil. Jahr., V, 1, pp. 42-51.

Mental acts have intensity, a definite magnitude, and so are conceivably measurable. But for measurement proper, the amount of difference between them must be ascertainable. This is not given by immediate judgment, but must be sought through circuitous means taught by psycho-physics.

It is not to be admitted that only rough measurements of mental acts are possible. Practice brings considerable accuracy in determining both the quality, e.g. of the situation of musical notes on the scale, and of intensity, e.g. of the light of the stars, and of intellectual attainments or ability, e.g. under the marking system.

Fechner starts from the principle that if several values are given as increasing and decreasing, it is possible to judge of the equality or inequality of any two, and so to determine a number of equivalent magnitudes. On this principle all physical measurement is based. In that sphere there is the difficulty that equivalent units cannot be determined with perfect accuracy. The errors thus arising are diminished by artificial means of observation, and by repetition of the measurement. The arrangement of the stars in classes according to their degrees of brightness shows that equality in sensations of light may be perceived, and the amount of inequality measured. Hence every psychical difference may be regarded as a definite multiple of the difference between two adjoining degrees on a scale of intensity. A psychical measure may thus be obtained from determinations of equality in different parts of the scale; and we may find how many times a smaller difference is contained in a larger. But to measure the difference is not necessarily to measure the sensations that differ.