The Sao Vicente Transportes Maritimos Do Estado v. Tietjen & Lang Drydock Company the Murmugao Transportes Maritimos Do Estado


The Sao Vicente Transportes Maritimos Do Estado v. Tietjen & Lang Drydock Company the Murmugao Transportes Maritimos Do Estado
by James Clark McReynolds
Syllabus
867154The Sao Vicente Transportes Maritimos Do Estado v. Tietjen & Lang Drydock Company the Murmugao Transportes Maritimos Do Estado — SyllabusJames Clark McReynolds
Court Documents

United States Supreme Court

260 U.S. 151

The Sao Vicente Transportes Maritimos Do Estado  v.  Tietjen & Lang Drydock Company the Murmugao Transportes Maritimos Do Estado

 Argued: Oct. 3, 1922. --- Decided: Nov 13, 1922

Mr. F. Dudley Kohler, of New York City, for petitioner.

Mr. E. Curtis Rouse, all of New York City, for respondent Tietjen & Lang Drydock Co.

Messrs. John M. Woolsey, Robert S. Erskine, Meyer Kraushaar,

[Argument of Counsel from page 152 intentionally omitted] Mr. J. Dexter Crowell, and Emanuel Celler, all of New York City, opposed.

Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes edit

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse