# Translation:An elementary geometrical representation of the transformation formulas of the special theory of relativity

**An elementary geometrical representation of the transformation formulas of the special theory of relativity.**

By P. *Gruner*.

The different geometrical representations of the Lorentz transformation either use rectangular coordinate systems with imaginary rotation angles (or imaginary time coordinates) or oblique coordinate systems with real magnitudes, though in which the units are different on every axis and have to be determined by Minkowski's unit hyperboloid. However, a geometric representation in which no imaginary quantities and no different units arise, is desirable for the introduction of beginners. Such a representation is easy to find, if one confines oneself to the comparison of two one-dimensional space-coordinate-systems only.

Two linear and straight reference systems and shall mutually move with constant velocity (one can think of two infinitely long, parallel trains, which travel past each other in absolutely dark night), let the clock indications and in every system be regulated, so that points and indicate the times and at the moment of encounter, then for every encounter (coincidence) of any two points with abscissas and and clock indications and , the following system of Lorentz transformation equations is given:

in which

(steadily ).

If one sets for simplification's sake^{[1]}‚ thus , then one can relate the events to two oblique spacetime coordinate systems and with common origin; according to *Minkowski* they have to represent a pair of conjugate diameters of invariant unit hyperbola

It can be seen without further ado, that there are two such pairs, at which the diameters are all of same length, and which are symmetrically located with respect to the axes of the hyperbola, thus they are mutually orthogonal. They form particularly convenient spacetime coordinate systems for the geometric representation.

These systems can be (as I was informed in a friendly way by Dr. *Sauter*, engineer in Bern) directly derived.

Axis is put to axis , and axis with inclination to , so that

thus

i.e, the transformation formulas for given above.

With this easily constructed coordinate systems, length contraction and clock retardation can be seen without further ado.

In the "primed" system (Fig. 2) the world-lines parallel to the time axis provide the "world history" of the point resting in this system. always represents the length of a rod resting in it.

The observers resting in the "unprimed" system can only measure this length , by finding out the location and of the endpoints of at *equal* clock-indication (thus upon a line parallel to ); they find

*i.e.* the known Lorentz contraction.

In the same way, the rate of *one* clock (Fig. 2) of the primed system can only be evaluated from the other system, when two observers and of the latter system compare their clock indications with the readings of the clock that travels past them. If the latter indicates the time interval

then the unprimed observer find the time interval

which is determined by the two lines which are parallel to and which go through and . The image gives:

*i.e.* Einstein's known retardation of the rate of a moving clock.

These example may suffice to show the clearness of this simple geometrical method. Though it should (also according to Dr. *Sauter*) be alluded to the circumstance, that by this choice of coordinate system, the somewhat abstract concept of *covariant* and *contravariant components* of a vector can be illustrated.

Namely (Fig. 1):

the *parallel projections* of vector denote its contravariant components

the *orthogonal projections*: denote its covariant components

Because it can easily be seen, that

,

thus the necessary invariance condition

persists. It is obvious that various illustrative consequences, also with respect to the fundamental tensor , can be drawn from that.

*Bern*, 19 May 1921.

(Received 21 May 1921.)

- ↑ The relativity formulas are presented most conveniently, if one choses 1 kilometer as unit of length and 1/300000 second as unit of time. We propose the name
*light second*for this unit of time.

Original: | This work is in the The author died in 1957, so this work is also in the |
---|---|

Translation: |