United States v. Cotton/Dissent Douglas

936328United States v. Cotton — DissentWilliam O. Douglas
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
Dissenting Opinion
Douglas

United States Supreme Court

397 U.S. 45

United States  v.  Cotton


Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, dissenting.

The requirement for filing the record in an appeal within the time prescribed by Rule 13 is not jurisdictional. Rather it is a provision of our own Rule which we often waive in the interests of justice. We should waive it here. The appeal now dismissed was solely protective under 18 U.S.C. § 3731. The main remedy sought was mandamus in the Court of Appeals, and the record naturally went to that court, not here. The issue tendered by the appeal now dismissed is whether the District Court properly dismissed the indictment, because there could be no 'fair trial' in the district at that time and that if a continuance was granted, appellees would be denied a speedy trial guaranteed by the Constitution.

That is an important question we should hear and decide.

Notes edit

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse