Colobikeguy~enwikisource
Introduction
editMy goal is to build up a library of various legal texts with annotations. This may be done on Wikibooks or Wikisources. --Colobikeguy 07:20, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Library
editThe library is to include links to various projects of love. The problem is not finding the source. The problem is a uniform portal to the source. For example, if I want to learn patent law, I am almost required to muddle may way through an unnamed treatise author's blase analysis of facts. If I turn to trademark, I get a different style.
Wikisource or -books will be problematic in this area in the beginning. But I am hoping to build templates that will guide writers to the same style. The Supreme Court template is a good example. But this still seems lacking in some respects. I havent really figured out how.
Legal Texts
editThe source of the legal texts should be from source sites on the internet. I am thinking of botting my own site to gather up the text as they are published and posting them on wikipedia.
Everyone seems interested in the Supreme Court. This is not really my area of interest. I am more interested in the drab and boring world of regulations. Supreme Court decisions are important, but they are more easily understood with a power sharing model rather than strict logic. Regulations are very well defined so the application (or lack thereof) is rather obvious.
Use of Annotations
editThere still seems to be some debate about whether annotated texts should be allowed in wikisources. Personally, I think that annotated cases and statutes should be in wikisources. Treatises that summarize the law without the complete statute or case law should be in wikibooks.
Welcome
editYour account will be renamed
editHello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Colobikeguy. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Colobikeguy~enwikisource that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
23:26, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed
editThis account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
06:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)