Watts v. United States/Dissent Fortas

Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinion
Douglas
Dissenting Opinion
Fortas
Wikipedia-logo-v2.svg Wikipedia article

United States Supreme Court

394 U.S. 705

Watts  v.  United States

 Argued: April 21, 1969. ---


Mr. Justice FORTAS, with whom Mr. Justice HARLAN joins, dissenting.

The Court holds, without hearing, that this statute is constitutional and that it is here wrongly applied. Neither of these rulings should be made without hearing, even if we assume that they are correct.

Perhaps this is a trivial case because of its peculiar facts and because the petitioner was merely given a suspended sentence. That does not justify the Court's action. It should induce us to deny certiorari, not to decide the case on its merits and to adjudicate the difficult questions that it presents.

NotesEdit

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).