Wikisource talk:Text quality

Problem entering an URL in the infobox source line

I've tried to note the source of a text I added (see Talk:Speech against the Union but it wouldn't accept it. Whenever the URL was included in the source line it just ignored any & all text on that line & moved the contributors text up to the source line. Anyone know the reason for this? AllanHainey 12:34, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

Textquality template

Where does the textquality template fit into this? Is it being phased out? Recommended for use? I only stumbled across it when I noticed the icon at the top of an article and wondered how that was done. If it's recommended, we should probably have a link to it somewhere. -- Quoth 16:31, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

It's been linked through the Style Guide. Banjee ca 01:09, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Icons in corner

How about we had these little text quality icons appear on the top left corner of the article, much like the way that in en.wikipedia for each Featured Article a little star icon appears at the same place? Would that be too hard to implement? --Wikipedia:User:Michalis Famelis

This is already done using {{textquality}}. For example, see Alone (see the article tab). // [admin] Pathoschild (^talk/_map) 16:33, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

recommendation is to change the ranking

Currently there is a discussion at Wikisource:Scriptorium#Text quality notation about changing the ranking used for rating articles level of development. Jeepday (talk) 23:45, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Category links?

Maybe this page should link to the categories 100%, 75%, etc? Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 15:42, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Seems useful

For keeping track of status, progress, and knowing where to go to verify people's proofing. Put me down for a vote in favor of bringing it back if that ever comes up. — LlywelynII 04:07, 13 June 2015 (UTC)