Conspectus of the History of Political Parties and the Federal Government/Conspectus of Political History/John Adams

Conspectus of the History of Political Parties and the Federal Government
by Walter Raleigh Houghton
3656155Conspectus of the History of Political Parties and the Federal GovernmentWalter Raleigh Houghton

John Adams’ Administration.


President’s position.—John Adams was inaugurated President in Congress Hall, at Philadelphia, March 4th, 1797. In his address he denied the charge of sympathy for England “which had been hurled against the administration.” This somewhat softened the ardor of the opposition; but the President continued his attachment for those who had elevated him to the position of Chief Magistrate.

France.—Complications with France demanded immediate attention. The French Directory having failed in drawing the United States into an alliance with France against the allied powers, and, incensed at the treaty with England concluded by Jay, dismissed the American minister and began to cripple our foreign trade. The President called an extra session of Congress, which convened on the 15th of May, 1797. He laid before that body a statement of the aggressions of France. The administration had a majority in the Senate, but the House was doubtful. Advances for reconciliation with France were made by the President with the concurrence of the Senate. Party spirit ran high and was “tinged with bitterness hitherto unknown.” The session closed on the 10th of July. “Notwithstanding the insults of the French Directory, the Republicans entertained an abiding affection for France.”

Stamp act.”—During the extra session an act was passed “laying duties on stamped vellum, parchment, and paper.” This law resembled the stamp act of 1705, and was obnoxious to a large number of people.

War versus France.—Negotiations for a peaceable adjustment of difficulties having proved fruitless, Congress began to prepare for war. A standing army (May, 1798), a naval armament, and the capture of French vessels, were authorized. Although neither country declared war, hostilities were begun upon the ocean. France, seeing the hostile attitude of the United States, made overtures for an adjustment of difficulties. These were accepted, and resulted in a treaty of peace (1800).

Enlargement of the army and navy.—The Republicans maintained that, previous to actual hostilities, the militia and a small naval force were sufficient for internal defense, and the protection of our coasts and harbors. Accordingly, the actions of Congress, providing for the establishment of a standing army, its enlargement, and that of the navy, were regarded as measures calculated to overawe public sentiment in time of peace.

Alien and Sedition laws.—The outrages of France were repugnant to many Republicans, and gained for a short time a large number of adherents to the Federal party. This rendered the administration sufficiently bold to attempt fettering its enemy at home. To this end were passed an alien, a sedition and a naturalization law.

The alien law empowered the President to send out of the country any person reasonably suspected of engaging in secret machinations against the government. It was opposed because it lodged with the executive too much power, and was liable to great abuse.

The sedition law authorized the punishment, by fine and imprisonment, of persons who should unlawfully oppose or stir up sedition against the Federal government or its officials. The Republicans resented the law, because it restricted the liberty of speech and of the press.

The naturalization law, with other requirements, provided that an alien must reside in the United States fourteen years before he could become a citizen. This law was repugnant to the Republicans, since if retarded immigration, allowed in the country too many persons owing no allegiance to the government, and assailed the idea that the rights of America are the rights of human nature.

The Kentucky and Virginia resolutions were occasioned by the alien and sedition laws. Their importance lies in the fact that with them the doctrine of nullification originated. Jefferson was the author of the former and Madison of the latter. The resolutions were protests against the measures of Congress, which, being unable to resist, the Republicans made through state legislatures. But Virginia did not stop with resolutions; it prepared to use force in resenting the encroachments of the Federal government, and for this purpose an armory was erected at Richmond.

Rupture of the cabinet.—When the Sixth Congress convened, the Federal gain had been such as to give the administration a majority in the House, but the gain was the result of external politics—the war with France—and its value could not be lasting. The supremacy of the Federal party was drawing to a close. A disaffection in its ranks had been growing for some time, when, in May, 1800, it occasioned a rupture of the cabinet. This served to weaken the efforts of the Federalists at

The election of 1800.—The Federal candidates for President and Vice-President were John Adams and C. C. Pinckney. Mr. Adams’ Federal opponents endeavored to secure the first position for Mr. Pinckney. Hamilton wrote a pamphlet setting forth the defects of Mr. Adams, and giving the “superior fitness of Mr. Pinckney for the position of Chief Magistrate.” There was no such division among the opposition. In 1800, a congressional convention, composed of Republicans, was held in Philadelphia. Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr were nominated as candidates for the executive offices. A platform of principles was promulgated. [See D. and Pl.] An earnest and spirited campaign followed. Of the electors chosen, seventy-three were Republicans, and sixty-five Federalists. By the constitution at that time, each elector voted for two persons; he who received the greatest number of votes was to be President, and he who received the next greatest was to be Vice-President. The Republicans voted so that Jefferson and Burr received each seventy-three votes, which threw the election into the House. Thomas Jefferson was chosen on the thirty-sixth ballot. During the excitement preceding the election of Jefferson the country was in peril. The Federalists thought of casting the election on the Senate, if the states could make no choice. To this the Republicans threatened forcible resistance. The efforts of the Federals in the House to defeat the election of Jefferson by forming a coalition with the friends of Burr, caused a great number to desert the Federal ranks and join the Republicans.

Democrats.—“Democratic-Republican,” abbreviated to the second word, continued to be the official name of the party of Jefferson. The unpopularity of Adams’ administration was transferred to the Federal party, and the name “Democrat,” by which this organization stigmatized the minority, was adopted by a good portion of them, and became a synonym for the word Republican.

Downfall of Federalism.—The election of 1800 broke the sceptre of Federal power. The defeated factions charged each other with causing the downfall of the Federal party. But for this political prostration there were other causes. The party maintained its supremacy from the first more through superior organization and skillful leaders than through the aid of a numerical majority; it organized a government, “novel in its character, and well calculated to create diversity of opinion relative to the details of its administration;” it adhered to the policy of non-interference with the affairs of foreign nations, a policy which, as regards England and France, was not approved by large numbers of the people; it increased the expenditures of the government to meet the rapid expansion and growing demand of the country, and this increase met with opposition, the causes not being sought. The Federal party did not fall without honor. “To it belongs the proud distinction of having laid the foundation of the government structure, and of having reared the machinery for its operation. The principles of the party survived its existence; they were denounced by the opposition, but were generally re-established and maintained by the party that succeeded to power.”