Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XII/Leo the Great/Introduction/Manuscripts

Manuscripts.

I.  At the Vatican.  (α) Of the Sermons.  (1)  Codd. 3835 and 6 are two volumes in Roman Character of a Lectionary of about the 8th century; the second volume contains the “Tome” (which in the 8th and 9th centuries used to be read in the Church offices before Christmas):  (2)  3828, a parchment (10th century), also a lectionary:  (3)  1195, a parchment folio (11th century), a lectionary containing inter alia some of Leo’s homilies:  (4)  1267, 8 and 9 of the same character (11th century):  (5)  1270 contains the Sermon de Festo Petri cathedræ, (now xiv. in Migne’s Appendix), from which Cacciari restored Quesnel’s imperfect edition of it to its present state:  (6)  1271 and 2 are also lectionaries:  (7)  4222 in Lombardic characters (9th century), a lectionary:  (8)  5451 in Roman characters (12th century), a lectionary:  (9)  6450 parchment (12th century):  a lectionary containing the sermon de Festo Petri cathedræ in the form found and printed by Quesnel; (10)  6451 similar:  it contains sermons de Quadragesima  and others:  (11)  6454 similar.

(β) Of the Letters:  these are mostly rather later (i.e. about 12th or 13th century):  but (1)  1322 is of an older date, and contains besides the epistles, all the acts of the Council of Chalcedon:  (2)  5759 is earlier than the 9th century; it used to belong to the monastery of S. Columban at Bobbio, and contains 31 letters:  (3)  5845 is very ancient, and according to Cacciari, Lombardic:  it contains 24 letters.

(γ) Letters and Sermons together:  of these there are nine collections in the Vatican, of which 548 and 9 contain the sermon de Absalom  which is condemned by Cacciari.  The Regio-Vaticanus codex 139 is a fine collection of Leo’s works (12th century).

II.  At other places:  (1)  The codex Urbinas 65 is thought to be a copy of the Regio-Vaticanus 139 made in the 14th century.

(2)  Codex Grimanicus[1]is a ms. on which Quesnel lays great stress:  Quesnel assigns it to the ninth century; it contains 107 letters, of which 28 had never been printed before Quesnel.

(3)  The Thuanei; (α) 129 contains 123 letters:  (β) 780 contains the Tome:  (γ) 729 contains the spurious de vocatione gentium and some epistles.

(4)  The Corbeienses are old.

(5)  The Taurinensis 29 D. iv. is a fine 13th-century ms. containing 52 letters.

(6)  The Florentinus codex belongs to the 13th century also.

(7)  Ratisbonensis 113 DD. AA., in the monastery of S. Emeramus, contains 72 letters:  it is said to date from about 750 a.d.

(8)  The two Bergonenses are of 12th century, and contain 12 sermons.

(9)  Two Chigiani also of 12th century contain 4 sermons.

(10)  The Padilironenses contain 9 sermons and the Tome.

(11)  There are three Patavini, of which two contain the Tome.

(12)  Vallicellani:  these are a number of 11th or 12th-century codices.

There are also the Veneti, the Vercellenses, the Veronenses, &c.

N.B.  The foregoing account is taken from Schönemann’s Notitia Historico-Literaria  (1794), and the translator has no means of knowing whether it is still correct (1890).


Footnotes edit

  1. Grimanus, from whom this Codex is named, was Cardinal of S. Mark, &c., in the 16th century.