According to this, the chronology of the times of the judges may be arranged as follows: -
| a. | From the oppression of Cushan-rishathaim to the death of Jair the judge (vid. p. 202), | 301 years. |
| b. | Duration of the Philistine oppression, | 40 years. |
| c. | Judgeship of Samuel and reign of Saul, | 39 years. |
| d. | David's reign (7 ½ and 33 years) | 40 years. |
| e. | Solomon's reign to the building of the temple, | 3 years. |
| 423 years. | ||
| a. | The wandering in the desert, | 40 years. |
| b. | the time between the entrance into Canaan and the division of the land, | 7 years. |
| c. | From the division of Canaan to the invasion of Chushan-rishathaim, | 10 years. |
| 480 years. |
These numbers are as thoroughly in harmony with 1Ki 6:1, and also with the statement made by Jephthah in his negotiations with the king of the Ammonites, that Israel dwelt in Heshbon and the cities along the bank of the Arnon for three hundred years (Jdg 11:26), as we could possibly expect so general a statement in round numbers to be. For instance, as the chronological data of the book of Judges give 301 years as the interval between the invasion of Chushan-rishathaim and the commencement of the Ammonitish oppression, and as only about ten years elapsed between the division of Canaan, after which the tribes on the east of the Jordan first established themselves firmly in Gilead, and the invasion of Chushan, the Israelites had dwelt 310 years in the land on the other side of the Jordan at the time of Jephthah's negotiations with the Ammonites, or at the most 328, admitting that these negotiations may possibly not have taken place till towards the end of the eighteen years' oppression on the part of the Ammonites, so that Jephthah could appeal with perfect justice to the fact that they had been in possession of the land for 300 years.
This statement of Jephthah, however, furnishes at the same time an important proof that the several chronological data contained in our book are to be regarded as historical, and also that the events are to be reckoned as occurring successively; so that we have no right to include the years of oppression in the years of rest, as is frequently done, or to shorten the whole period from Othniel to Jephthah by arbitrary assumptions of synchronisms, in direct opposition to the text. This testimony removes all foundation from
