Page:AASHO USRN 1958-06-26.pdf/2

158

STATE	ROUTE No.	DESCRIPTION
VERMONT   APRROVED	U. S. 2 B.R. Recognition of a Business Route in Montpelier	Proposed routing would be over former U.S. 2 through the city on Main and State Streets.
OHIO   APPROVED	U. S. 6. Relocation	This routing would be over Ohio State Route 384 which is being constructed as a high type highway and thereby avoiding a congested area in Bryan.
" APPROVED	U. S. 62 Relocation	This routing would be over a new location between Canton and a point on old U. S. 62 north of Louisville.
" APPROVED	U. S. 68 Abandonment of Section	This proposal would eliminate the portion of U. S. 68 between U. S. 25 north of Findlay and a point about 3 miles southwest of Findlay. (Apparently U. S. 68 has been eliminate by Ohio from a point just north of Findlay to its northern terminus in Toledo, and this proposal would make the northern terminal point of U. S. 68 the intersection with U.S. 25 southwest of Findlay.)
" APPROVED	U. S. 224 Relocation	This routing would be over a new high standard highway by-passing Tiffin on the south and west.
MISSISSIPPI   APPROVED	U. S. 11 By-Pass Abandonment	This proposal would eliminate U. S. 11 By-Pass marking established June 27, 1957 at Hattiesburg.
VIRGINIA   APPROVED	U. S. 13 Relocation	Proposed marking would be over new routing leaving U. S. Routes 38 and 460 east of Suffolk at Magnolia then following present Virginia Route 337 southwesterly around and through the southeasterly part of Suffolk to present U. S. Route 13 in South Suffolk. Present U. S. Route 13 marking through the City proper would be eliminated and length of U. S. Route 13 would be reduced 0.10 mile.
KENTUCKY   APPROVED	U. S. 31 E Relocation	Proposed marking would be over a new high standard highway recently constructed between Lincoln Memorial Park and Magnolia. New routing would reduce travel distance on this route 2.5 miles.