Page:A History of Indian Philosophy Vol 1.djvu/195

This page needs to be proofread.

VI] Syiidviida 179 things may be held to be true from other points of view. The truth of each affirmation is thus only conditional, and incon- ceivable from the absolute point of view. To guarantee correctness therefore each affirmation should be preceded by the phrase syiit (may be). This will indicate that the affirmation is only relative, 1 made somehow, from some point of view and under some reser- vations and not in any sense absolute. There is no judgment which is absolutely true, and no judgment which is absolutely false. All judgments are true in some sense and false in another. This brings us to the famous J aina doctrine of Syadvada 1. The Doctrine of Syadvada. The doctrine of Syadvada holds that since the most contrary characteristics of infinite variety may be associated with a thing, affirmation made from whatever standpoint (naya) cannot be re- garded as absolute. All affirmations are true (in some syiidasti or "may be it is" sense); all affirmations are false in some sense; all affirmations are indefinite or inconceivable in some sense (syiidavaktavya); all affirmations are true as well as false in some sense (syiidasti syiinniisti); all affirmations are true as well as in- definite (syiidasti ciivaktavyasca); all affirmations are false as well as indefinite; all affirmations are true and false and indefinite in some sense (syadasti syallnasti syadavaktavyasca). Thus we may say "the jug is" or the jug has being, but it is more correct to say explicitly that "may be (syat) that the jug is," otherwise if "being" here is taken absolutely of any and every kind of being, it might also mean that there is a lump of clay or a pillar, or a cloth or any other thing. The existence here is limited and defined by the form of the jug. "The jug is" does not mean absolute existence but a limited kind of existence as determined by the form of the jug, "The jug is" thus means that a limited kind of existence, namely the jug-existence is affirmed and not existence in general in the absolute or unlimited sense, for then the sentence "the jug is" might as well mean "the clay is," "the tree is," "the cloth is," etc. Again the existence of the jug is determined by the negation of all other things in the world; each quality or charac- teristic (such as red colour) of the jug is apprehended and defined by the negation of all the infinite varieties (such as black, blue, golden), etc., of its class, and it is by the combined negation of all 1 See V;feiivafyaka bhiiya, pp. 895, etc., and Syiidviida11laiijari, pp. 170, etc.