This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
366
MAGNETISM, TERRESTRIAL
  


at the Cape of Good Hope does not differ much from that seen at Batavia. Only a single period is clearly shown. The maximum occurs about 8 or 9 p.m. throughout the year. The time of the minimum is more variable; at midsummer it occurs about 11 a.m., but at midwinter three or four hours later. At Hobart the type varies considerably with the season. In June (midwinter) a double period is visible. The principal minimum occurs about 8 a.m., as at the Cape. But, corresponding to the evening maximum seen at the Cape, there is now only a secondary maximum, the principal maximum occurring about 1 p.m. At midsummer the principal maximum is found—as at Kew or Greenwich—about 10 or 11 a.m., the principal minimum about 4 p.m.

§ 18. Even at tropical stations a considerable seasonal change is usually seen in the amplitude of the diurnal inequality in at least one of the magnetic elements. At stations in Europe, and generally in temperate latitudes, the amplitude varies notably in all the elements. Table XIII. gives particulars of the inequality range of declination derived from hourly readings at selected stations, arranged in order of latitude from north to south. The letters “a” and “q” are used in the same sense as before. At temperate stations in either hemisphere—e.g. Pavlovsk, Greenwich or Hobart—the range is conspicuously larger in summer than in winter. In northern temperate stations a decided minimum is usually apparent in December. There is, on the other hand, comparatively little variation in the range from April to August. Sometimes, as at Kew and Greenwich, there is at least a suggestion of a secondary minimum at midsummer. Manila and Trivandrum show a transition from the December minimum, characteristic of the northern stations, to the June minimum characteristic of the southern, there being two conspicuous minima in February or March and in November or October. At St Helena there are two similar minima in May and September, while a third apparently exists in December. It will be noticed that at both Pavlovsk and Kew the annual variation in the range is specially prominent in the quiet day results.

Table XIV. gives a smaller number of data analogous to those of Table XIII., comprising inequality ranges for horizontal force, vertical force and inclination. In some cases the number of years from which the data were derived seems hardly sufficient to give a smooth annual variation. It should also be noticed that unless the same group of years is employed the data from two stations are not strictly comparable. The difference between the all and quiet day vertical force data at Pavlovsk is remarkably pronounced. The general tendency in all the elements is to show a reduced range at midwinter; but in some cases there is also a distinct reduction in the range at midsummer. This double annual period is particularly well marked at Batavia.

Table XIV.—Ranges in the Diurnal Inequalities.

   Jan.   Feb.  March.  April.   May.   June.   July.   Aug.   Sept.   Oct.   Nov.   Dec. 
H (unit 1γ)                        
 Pavlovsk 1890–1900 a  12 20 32 46 47 49 49 44 39 32 17 11
   ” q  12 17 31 42 45 45 42 40 37 31 17 10
 Ekatarinburg a  11 15 29 37 40 40 39 36 33 27 13  9
 Kew q  15 17 26 36 38 39 38 38 35 27 20 11
 Toronto 1843–1848 a  23 21 24 28 29 29 26 28 41 25 21 20
 Batavia 1883–1898 a  49 47 54 60 51 48 50 53 58 52 43 40
 St Helena 1843–1847 a  43 41 48 53 46 40 40 45 41 40 40 32
 Mauritius 1883–1890 a  21 15 21 23 20 21 20 22 20 21 21 20
 Cape of Good Hope  1841–1846 a  13 10 13 13 15 16 14 18 21 14 17 20
 Hobart 1842–1848 a  42 43 34 28 19 17 22 23 23 35 39 42
                         
V (unit 1γ)                        
 Pavlovsk 1890–1900 a  15 27 29 24 26 20 23 19 23 20 18 14
   ” q   4  5  9 13 13 12 13 10  9  7  5  4
 Ekatarinburg a  10 15 17 21 22 19 20 16 14 13 11  9
 Kew 1891–1900 q   7 10 20 25 31 27 28 23 20 15  9  6
 Toronto 1843–1848 a  12 14 17 23 26 14 27 32 34 25 19 18
 Batavia 1883–1898 a  42 48 48 45 31 31 32 29 41 50 40 33
 St Helena 1843–1847 a  16 13 12 14 13 11 17 11 17 11 15 18
 Mauritius 1884–1890 a  12 16 18 15 14 13 15 21 20 16 13 11
 Cape of Good Hope 1841–1846 a  29 47 41 38 21 12 14 19 19 35 33 28
 Hobart 1842–1848 a 25 27 22 23 24 21 22 28 26 22 23 27
                         
Inclination
 Pavlovsk 1890–1900 a  0.97 1.24 2.07 2.79 2.72 2.88 2.85 2.64 2.52 2.18 1.20 0.89
 Ekatarinburg a  0.79 0.94 1.70 2.08 2.25 2.19 2.18 2.08 2.00 1.70 0.88 0.69
 Kew q  0.98 1.01 1.38 1.86 2.05 2.02 2.05 2.15 1.98 1.57 1.27 0.63
 Toronto 1843–1848 a  1.15 0.94 1.19 1.23 1.31 1.37 1.13 1.26 1.87 1.16 1.09 1.05
 Batavia 1883–1898 a  4.88 5.22 5.56 5.62 4.21 4.05 4.24 4.17 5.13 5.58 4.51 3.85
 Cape of Good Hope 1842–1846 a  1.55 2.29 2.23 2.23 1.60 1.41 1.54 1.70 1.86 2.03 1.55 2.04
 Hobart 1842–1848 a  1.95 2.16 1.72 1.62 1.23 1.16 1.28 1.42 1.39 1.75 2.04 2.10

§ 19. When discussing diurnal inequalities it is sometimes convenient to consider the components of the horizontal force in and perpendicular to the astronomical meridian, rather than the horizontal force and declination. If N and W be the components of H to astronomical north and west, and D the westerly declination, N = H cos D, W = H sin D. Thus corresponding small variations in N, W, H and D are connected by the relations:—

δN = cos DδH − H sin DδD, δW = sin DδH + H cos DδD.

If δH and δD denote the departures of H and D at any hour of the day from their mean values, then δN and δW represent the corresponding departures of N and W from their mean values. In this way diurnal inequalities may be calculated for N and W when those for H and D are known. The formulae suppose δD to be expressed in absolute measure, i.e. 1′ of arc has to be replaced by 0.0002909. If we take as an example a station at which H is .185 then HδD = .0000538 (number of minutes in δD). In other words, employing 1γ as unit of force, one replaces HδD by 5.38δD, where δD represents declination change expressed as usual in minutes of arc. In calculating diurnal inequalities for N and W, one ought, strictly speaking, to assign to H and D the exact mean values belonging to these elements for the month or the year being dealt with. For practical purposes, however, a slight departure from the true mean values is immaterial, and one can make use of a constant value for several successive years without sensible error. As an example, Table XV. gives the mean diurnal inequality for the whole year in N and W at Falmouth, as calculated from the 12 years 1891 to 1902. The unit employed is 1γ.

The data in Table XV. are closely similar to corresponding Kew data, and are presumably fairly applicable to the whole south of England for the epoch considered. At Falmouth there is comparatively little seasonal variation in the type of the diurnal variation in either N or W. The amplitude of the diurnal range varies, however, largely with the season, as will appear from Table XVI., which is based on the same 12 years as Table XV.

Diurnal inequalities in N and W lend themselves readily to the construction of what are known as vector diagrams. These are curves showing the direction and intensity at each hour of the day of the horizontal component of the disturbing force to which the diurnal inequality may be regarded as due. Figs. 7 and 8, taken from the Phil. Trans. vol. 204A, will serve as examples. They refer to the mean diurnal inequalities for the months stated at Kew (1890 to 1900) and Falmouth (1891 to 1902), thick lines relating to Kew, thin to Falmouth. NS and EW represent the geographical north-south and east-west directions; their intersection answers to the origin (thick lines for Kew, thin for Falmouth). The line from the origin to M represents the magnetic meridian. The line from the origin to any cross—the number indicating the corresponding hour counted from midnight as 0—represents the magnitude and direction at that hour of the horizontal component of the disturbing force to which the diurnal inequality may be assigned. The cross marks the point whose rectangular co-ordinates are the values of δN and δW derived from the diurnal inequalities of these elements. In figs. 7 and 8 the distances of the points N, E, S, W from their corresponding origin represents 10γ. The tendency to form a loop near midnight, seen in the November and December