Page:Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1st ed, 1833, vol II).djvu/131

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
CH. IX.]
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
105

variety of its interests, and occupations, and institutions would require a very numerous body in order to bring home information necessary and proper for wise legislation.[1]

§ 655. In answer to this objection, it was admitted, that the representative ought to be acquainted with the interests and circumstances of his constituents. But this principle can extend no farther, than to those interests and circumstances, to which the authority and care of the representative relate. Ignorance of very minute objects, which do not lie within the compass of legislation, is consistent with every attribute necessary to the performance of the legislative trust.[2] If the argument, indeed, required the most minute knowledge, applicable even to all the professed objects of legislation, it would overturn itself; for the thing would be utterly impracticable. No representative, either in the state or national councils, ever could know, or even pretend to know, all arts, and sciences, and trades, and subjects, upon which legislation may operate. One of the great duties of a representative is to inquire into, and to obtain the necessary information to enable him to act wisely and correctly in particular cases. And this is attained by bringing to the investigation of such cases talents, industry, experience, and a spirit of comprehensive inquiry. No one will pretend, that he, who is to make laws, ought not to be well instructed in their nature, interpretation, and practical results. But what would be said, if, upon such a theory, it was to be seriously urged, that none, but practical lawyers, ought ever to be eligible as legislators? The truth is, that we must rest
  1. 1 Elliot's Debates, 219 220, 228, 232, 233, 241.
  2. The Federalist, No. 55; 1 Elliot's Debates, 228, 229; 1 Kent's Comm. 217.