Wikisource

Page:Male relatedness and familiarity are required to modulate male-induced harm to females in Drosophila.pdf/8

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
  1. Hatchwell BJ, Ross DJ, Fowlie MK, McGowan A. 2001 Kin discrimination in cooperatively breeding long-tailed tits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 885–890. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1598)
  2. Sharp SP, McGowan A, Wood MJ, Hatchwell BJ. 2005 Learned kin recognition cues in a social bird. Nature 434, 1127–1130 (doi:10.1038/nature03522)
  3. Aquiloni L, Tricarico E. 2015 Social recognition in invertebrates. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  4. Holmes WG, Sherman PW. 1983 Kin recognition in animals: the prevalence of nepotism among animals raises basic questions about how and why they distinguish relatives from unrelated individuals. Am. Sci. 71, 46–55. (doi:10.2307/27851817)
  5. Clancy D, Kennington WJ. 2001 A simple method to achieve consistent larval density in bottle cultures. Drosoph. Inf. Serv. 84, 168–169.
  6. Partridge L, Farquhar M. 1983 Lifetime mating success of male fruitflies (Drosophila melanogaster) is related to their size. Anim. Behav. 31, 871–877. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(83)80242-5)
  7. Lewis EB. 1960 A new standard food medium. Drosoph. Inf. Serv. 34, 117–118.
  8. Chen S, Lee AY, Bowens NM, Huber R, Kravitz EA. 2002 Fighting fruit flies: a model system for the study of aggression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5664–5668. (doi:10.1073/pnas.082102599)
  9. Bastock M, Manning A. 1955 The courtship of Drosophila melanogaster. Behaviour 8, 85–111. (doi:10.2307/4532825)
  10. Bainbridge SP, Bownes M. 1981 Staging the metamorphosis of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 66, 57–80.
  11. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. 2012 JMP 10.0.
  12. Venables WN, Ripley BD. 2002 Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. New York, NY: Springer.
  13. R Core Team. 2014 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  14. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White JSS. 2009 Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 127–135. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008)
  15. Nguyen TTX, Moehring AJ. 2015 Accurate alternative measurements for female lifetime reproductive success in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE 10, e0116679. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0116679)
  16. Faria GS, Varela SAM, Gardner A. 2017 Sexual selection modulates genetic conflicts and patterns of genomic imprinting. Evolution 71, 526–540. (doi:10.1111/evo.13153)
  17. Loyau A, Cornuau JH, Clobert J, Danchin É. 2012 Incestuous sisters: mate preference for brothers over unrelated males in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE 7, e51293. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051293)
  18. Robinson SP, Kennington WJ, Simmons LW. 2012 Preference for related mates in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 84, 1169–1176. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.08.020)
  19. Tan CKW, Løvlie H, Pizzari T, Wigby S. 2012 No evidence for precopulatory inbreeding avoidance in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 83, 1433–1441. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.03.015)
  20. Tan CKW, Lovlie H, Greenway E, Goodwin SF, Pizzari T, Wigby S. 2013 Sex-specific responses to sexual familiarity, and the role of olfaction in Drosophila. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20131691. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.1691)
  21. Ferveur J-F. 2005 Cuticular hydrocarbons: their evolution and roles in Drosophila pheromonal communication. Behav. Genet. 35, 279–295. (doi:10.1007/s10519-005-3220-5)
  22. Lizé A, McKay R, Lewis Z. 2014 Kin recognition in Drosophila: the importance of ecology and gut microbiota. ISME J. 8, 469–477. (doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.157)
  23. Blomquist GJ, Melorose J, Perroy R, Careas S. 2015 Insect hydrocarbons biology, biochemistry, and chemical ecology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Lizé A, McKay R, Lewis Z. 2013 Gut microbiota and kin recognition. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 325–326. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.013)
  25. Chandler JA, Lang J, Bhatnagar S, Eisen JA, Kopp A. 2011 Bacterial communities of diverse Drosophila species: ecological context of a host–microbe model system. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002272 (doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002272)
  26. Bakula M. 1969 The persistence of a microbial flora during postembryogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 14, 365–374. (doi:10.1016/0022-2011(69)90163-3)
  27. Buchon N, Broderick NA, Lemaitre B. 2013 Gut homeostasis in a microbial world: insights from Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11, 615–626. (doi:10.1038/nrmicro3074)
  28. Hepper PG. 2005 Kin recognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  29. Sokolowski MB. 1985 Genetics and ecology of Drosophila melanogaster larval foraging and pupation behaviour. J. Insect Physiol. 31, 857–864. (doi:10.1016/0022-1910(85)90103-9)
  30. Markow TA, O’Grady P. 2008 Reproductive ecology of Drosophila. Funct. Ecol. 22, 747–759. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01457.x)
  31. Atkinson WD. 1983 Gregarious oviposition in Drosophila melanogaster is explained by surface texture. Aust. J. Zool. 31, 925–929. (doi:10.1071/ZO9830925)
  32. del Solar E, Palomino H. 1966 Choice of oviposition in Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 100, 127–133. (doi:10.1086/282406)
  33. Medina-Munõz MC, Godoy-Herrera R. 2005 Dispersal and prepupation behavior of Chilean sympatric Drosophila species that breed in the same site in nature. Behav. Ecol. 16, 316–322. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arh125)
  34. de Belle JS, Sokolowski MB. 1987 Heredity of rover/sitter: alternative foraging strategies of Drosophila melanogaster larvae. Heredity 59, 73–83. (doi:10.1038/hdy.1987.98)
  35. Stamps J, Buechner M, Alexander K, Davis J, Zuniga N. 2005 Genotypic differences in space use and movement patterns in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 70, 609–618. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.11.018)
  36. Stamps JA, Blozis SA. 2006 Effects of natal experience on habitat selection when individuals make choices in groups: a multilevel analysis. Anim. Behav. 71, 663–672. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.07.015)
  37. Reaume CJ, Sokolowski MB. 2006 The nature of Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 16, R623– R628. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.042)
  38. Atkinson WD. 1979 A comparison of the reproductive strategies of domestic species of Drosophila. J. Anim. Ecol. 48, 53–64. (doi:10.2307/4099)
  39. Yang C, Belawat P, Hafen E, Jan LY, Jan Y-N. 2008 Drosophila egg-laying site selection as a system to study simple decision-making processes. Science 319, 1679–1683. (doi:10.1126/science.1151842)
  40. Robinson SP, Kennington WJ, Simmons LW. 2012 Assortative mating for relatedness in a large naturally occurring population of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 25, 716–725. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02466.x)
  41. Schneider J, Dickinson MH, Levine JD. 2012 Social structures depend on innate determinants and chemosensory processing in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 17174–17179. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1121252109)
  42. Enquist M, Leimar O. 1983 Evolution of fighting behaviour: decision rules and assessment of relative strength. J. Theor. Biol. 102, 387–410. (doi:10.1016/0022-5193(83)90376-4)
  43. Hardy ICW, Briffa M. 2013 Animal contests. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  44. Billeter J-C, Jagadeesh S, Stepek N, Azanchi R, Levine JD. 2012 Drosophila melanogaster females change mating behaviour and offspring production based on social context. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 2417–2425. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.2676)
  45. Wigby S, Sirot LK, Linklater JR, Buehner N, Calboli FCF, Bretman A, Wolfner MF, Chapman T. 2009 Seminal fluid protein allocation and male reproductive success. Curr. Biol. 19, 751–757. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.036)
  46. Sirot LK, Wolfner MF, Wigby S. 2011 Protein-specific manipulation of ejaculate composition in response to female mating status in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9922–9926. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1100905108)
  47. Perry JC, Sirot L, Wigby S. 2013 The seminal symphony: how to compose an ejaculate. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 414–422. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.03.005)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Page:Male_relatedness_and_familiarity_are_required_to_modulate_male-induced_harm_to_females_in_Drosophila.pdf/8&oldid=7693649"