Artec dot a Baroccimia. 113 TrpocTTaKTiKrj avTi ttj^ viroTaKTiKY}^ Trjs jurj 7r/^9. ttcol ttoo- orcoTra to? ei/ avTcoi^v^iai^^ acperepov Trarep v/uveiovaat' (Hesiod. Op. J. 2) avTL Tov vfxeTepov. irepi ra? fxeTO'^a^' OvK av €(p vjui€T€p(jov oye(i)v irXriyevTe Kepavvw' (II. G. 4<55) avTL TOV TrXfjyelaai. irepi tu apOpa' yiaKpOLdL ^vcftoIgl Ta pa a(p €7ri vrjvaiv €K€ito. (II. O. 388) Trepi Ta9 TrpoOeaei^' KaTTTreaov ev Arjiupcp. (II. A. 593) /cat irapa QovKvoioff "eh to Hpaiov eKadeXovro'^'^^ . koI Trapd l^evdvcpip* KaOi^ctvei jaev evioT el^ ra arjaa^a (MS. adarj/ua). Kal eV ^oCpooeel'^ Eiriarj/ixov av Tfjv aaTrio ei^ _^Trjvj A«09 cxTodv AveOrjKav. Trept Ta eTripprjfxaTay ^9 Trap ^vpiTricr)'^ YloWf] imev €v (ipOTOiai kovk avcovvimo^ Qea KeKXrjiaai Kvirpt^y ovpavov t eaw" ^ This passage is probably from the Hecale. I will subjoin some additional fragments from the same poet. Melet. de Nat. Hom. Cod. Barocc. f. 246. T6v de tov ^LacfypdyfxaTo^ vjxeva Trepl- ireTrXov Xeyovciy cid to TrepLeikeiGdaL avTov toT^ (nfKdy^voi^* rj TreTrXoi/, Sid to vipaTrXovadai' rj ttcctos cc'tto toi5 Treirrix^aL Kal olov (Twecpi^daL' oto Kal 6 KaWi/uiaxo^ OUTOJS €(prj' "HpaQ
- ' Ayvov }(p't]vd(Ji€vai ttJoL />te/x.?]Xe ttccto?.
The Latin version reads corruptly, ijpL^ du uipriejULevaL n-yjcrL /xe^^jXc ttccto?. Theognost. Cod. Barocc. 50. Can. 207. 'A^aa^coV, 'A/xa^oi/o? XeyeTai Kal dparevLKw^, W9 Trapd KaWi/ndxi^' '^v 'A/xa^oi/es dvdp€9 ewcrLP, Choerobosc. irepl ttoctot^to's Cod. Barocc. 50. f. 177- Ta ek o- Xt^yovTa ovo/uLan-a /jLOVocrvWafSd irepLmritifJieva did tov etos Trapayofxeva oid tjJ? et OKpdoyyov ypd- (povTaL, olov food's (^oeTo^j cus, cuelos, ^us fxveio^, Trats 'waideLO^ T/ootto?* ^et ^e TTpoarGelvaL pn] ovTa dwd tov eh au?, eTreiSr] TavTa Sid tov I ypd(p6TaL' olov ypav9, ypdio's Kal yprj'io^ irapd KaXXt/xa)(a)* ypij'iov eldo^ e'^ovca,^ tovt ecttlv ypao's. This fragment occurs also in the Etymol. Magn. but the name of the poet is not men- tioned (p. 603. 23). ^ The passage here referred to is in the 1st Book, ch. 23. TavTa Se iKeTai Kade- X,6p.6voL €9 TO 'Hpalov iSiovTo. ^ Both these fragments are new. For an account of the ^o(pod6i]9 of Menander, see Meineke Menandr. Rel. p. 183. The following citation in Barocc. MS. 50. f. 318. may possibly be also from Menander : XaXecprj^' d-n-d tov x^^XeTTTM^ o-uyywOt /xot Kal /xjj x«X6(^779 w iraTep, 9 The opening of the Hippolytus. Vol. I. No. 4. P
