Page:Thaler v. Perlmutter, Memorandum Opinion (Dkt. 24).pdf/15

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

Case 1:22-cv-01564-BAH Document 24 Filed 08/18/23 Page 15 of 15

never eligible for copyright, so none of the doctrines invoked by plaintiff conjure up a copyright over which ownership may be claimed.

IV. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, defendants are correct that the Copyright Office acted properly in denying copyright registration for a work created absent any human involvement. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is therefore denied and defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment is granted.

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion will be entered contemporaneously. Date: August 18, 2023

A personal signature appears here

BERYL A. HOWELL
United States District Judge

15