Page:The Dunciad - Alexander Pope (1743).djvu/83

This page has been validated.
52
The Dunciad.
Book I.
105 She saw slow Philips creep like Tate's poor page,
And all the mighty Mad[R. 1] in Dennis rage.

Remarks

    well be jumbled together, and are of that sort of nonsense, which so perfectly confounds all ideas, that there is no distinct one left in the mind." Farther he says of him, "That he hath prophecied his own poetry shall be sweeter than Catullus, Ovid, and Tibullus; but we have little hope of the accomplishment of it, from what he hath lately published." Upon which Mr. Oldmixon has not spared a reflection, "That the putting the Laurel on the head of one who writ such verses, will give futurity a very lively idea of the judgment and justice of those who bestowed it." Ibid. p. 417. But the well known learning of that Noble Person, who was then Lord Chamberlain, might have screened him from this unmannerly reflection. Nor ought Mr. Oldmixon to complain, so long after, that the Laurel would have better become his own brows, or any others: It were more decent to acquiesce in the opinion of the Duke of Buckingham upon this matter:

    ——In rush'd Eusden, and cry'd, Who shall have it,
    But I, the true Laureate, to whom the King gave it?
    Apollo beg'd pardon, and granted his claim,
    But vow'd that 'till then he ne'er heard of his name
    .
    Session of Poets.
    The same plea might also serve for his successor, Mr. Cibber; and is further strengthened in the following Epigram, made on that occasion:
    In merry old England it once was a rule,
    The King had his Poet, and also his Fool:
    But now we're so frugal, I'd have you to know it,
    That Cibber can serve both for Fool and for Poet
    .
    Of Blackmore, see Book 2. Of Philips, Book 1. ver. 262. and Book 3. prope fin.
    Nahum Tate was Poet Laureate, a cold writer, of no invention; but sometimes translated tolerably when befriended by Mr. Dryden. In his second part of Absalom and Achitophel are above two hundred admirable lines together of that great hand, which strongly shine through the insipidity of the rest. Something parallel may be observed of another author here mentioned.

  1. Ver. 106. And all the mighty Mad] This is by no means to be understood literally, as if Mr. Dennis were really mad, according to the Narrative of Dr. Norris in Swift and Pope's Miscellanies, vol. 3. No—it is spoken of that Excellent and Divine Madness, so often mentioned by Plato; that poetical rage and enthusiasm, with which Mr. D. hath, in his time, been highly possessed; and of those extraordinary hints and motions whereof he himself so feelingly treats in his preface to the Rem. on Pr. Arth. [See notes on Book 2. ver. 268.]