Page:The European Concert in the Eastern Question.djvu/322

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
306
THE BALKAN PENINSULA, ETC.: TEXTS.

Persian frontier,The Sublime Porte cedes to Persia the town and territory of Khotour, as fixed by the mixed Anglo-Russian Commission for the delimitation of the frontiers of Turkey and of Persia[1].

Obligations of the Porte, 61-72.

Obligations in Armenia,Art. LXI. The Sublime Porte undertakes to carry out, without further delay, the improvements and reforms demanded by local requirements in the provinces inhabited by the Armenians, and to guarantee their security against the Circassians and Kurds.

It will periodically make known the steps taken to this effect to the Powers, who will superintend their application[2].

as to religious liberty and privileges,Art. LXII. The Sublime Porte having expressed the intention to maintain the principle of religious liberty, and give it the widest scope, the Contracting Parties take note of this spontaneous declaration.

In no part of the Ottoman Empire shall difference of religion be alleged against any person as a ground for exclusion or incapacity as regards the discharge of civil and political rights, admission to the public employments, functions and honours, or the exercise of the various professions and industries[3].

All persons shall be admitted, without distinction of religion, to give evidence before the tribunals[4].

The freedom and outward exercise of all forms of worship are assured to all, and no hindrance shall be offered either to the hierarchical organizations of the various communions or to their relations with their spiritual chiefs.

  1. It was not till May, 1883, that the Porte intimated its acceptance of the proposed delimitation of this territory.
  2. These provinces are said to contain about 1,000,000 Christians as against 800,000 Mahomedans. Little has been done towards compliance with this Article (iwrhich reproduces Art. 16 of the Treaty of San Stefano), although attention has been repeatedly called to the subject in the British Parliament, especially by Mr. Bryce. See Pari. Papers, 1880, Turkey, Nos. 4, 23, 1881, Turkey, No. 6. A scheme of reform was submitted to the Porte by the Ambassadors of the Powers at Constantinople on 9th February, 1882.
  3. The representative of the Porte at the Brussels Conference maintained that these provisions were only declaratory of what was already the law in Turkey, and apparently with reason ; see Appendix, No. I.
  4. Note the special character of this provision.