rabbies have departed from the Scripture representation of the
divine character, and the number preceding proved that the
Jews haw not retained even the outward form of the Mosaic
edifice. Indeed we know not any problem more difficult of
solution than, to assign a reason, why the rabbinic Jews profess
any respect at all for Moses, when they have rejected both
the form and the substance of his teaching. If they boldly
denied his authority, or asserted that the Mosaic law was long
since abrogated, and the rabbinic precepts given in its stead,
we could, at least, give them credit for consistency; but at
present we cannot possibly divine their motives for professing
attachment to the lawgiver of their forefathers. Their conduct
for ages would appear to indicate a fixed determination to get
rid and keep clear of every thing Mosaic, and that for the
mere purpose of having something else; for no one can pretend,
that the new law and the new teachers, that they have
chosen, can lay any claim to superior excellence or antiquity.
Of the value of the rabbinic teaching we have given many
proofs; and now think of examining a little the novelty of the
rabbinic order. It is certain that the word, rabbi, does not
occur in the law of Moses nor the prophets; it is, therefore,
clearly not Mosaic. This one fact does in itself go far to shake
the authority of modern Judaism and the oral law. There we
cannot go a step without hearing of the rabbies—Rabbi Eliezer
said this, and Rabbi Bar Bar Chanah said that. The
whole oral law is made up of the sayings of the rabbies, and
yet neither their name nor their order was so much as known
to Moses our master. The other favourite appellation of the
Talmudic doctors (
Hebrew characters) Chacham, or wise man, does indeed
occur, and it appears from the prophets, that there were some
even in their time who laid exclusive claim to that epithet, but
unfortunately the prophets bring against them the very same
charge, which we prefer against their successors, namely, that
they had forsaken the law of Moses:—
(Hebrew characters)
"How do ye say, We are wise (Chachamim) and the law of the Lord is with us? Lo, certainly in vain made he it; the pen of the scribes is in vain. The wise men (Chachamim) are ashamed. They are dismayed and taken: lo, they have rejected the word of the Lord: and what wisdom is in them?" (Jer. viii. 8, 9.) The rabbies will scarcely acknowledge that they have succeeded these persons in their office, and yet if they give up such passages as these, they must abdicate all claim to antiquity. Indeed some of them plainly acknow-
