connected with the movement into the interior of Mexico, were not the labors of a few days. Scott knew this full well. He suggested the 1st of September as the earliest day for passing in full force beyond the Rio Grande,[1] ard assiduously applied himself to the preliminary work, in which he was engaged fourteen hours daily. But the nation was excited and impatient. His necessary delay at Washington was regarded as inactivity. Why did he not hasten to the seat of war? it was asked; and prominent men made unfavorable comments upon his presence in the capital. It was forgotten that the vast preliminary arrangements could only be made advantageously at that place, through the respective chiefs of the general staff. Within only a week after the declaration of war Marcy informed Scott that much impatience was felt because he had not already put himself en route for the Rio Grande. There was, moreover, a bill before the senate which proposed to authorize the appointment of two additional major-generals, giving the president power also of selecting generals for the command of the 50,000 volunteers.[2] This measure, if adopted, would have given the president power to place some new general over the head of Scott. The sensitiveness of the commander-in-chief, who as yet had received only verbal orders assigning him to the command, was irritated, and on the 21st of May he addressed a letter to the secretary of war which contained expressions that were construed into reflections upon the conduct of the president.[3]
After four days' consideration of his note, the president directed Marcy to inform him that he was relieved of the command, but would be continued in his
- ↑ He afterward, May 25th, came to the conclusion, according to most reliable information, that such operations could not be assumed with the least possible advantage before the Ist of October. U. S. Govt Doc., Cong. 29, Ses. 1, Sen. 378, p. 11.
- ↑ See Scott's letter to Marcy in Id., p. 16.
- ↑ Marcy replied on the 25th, astonished at Scott's language. I do not want a fire upon ny rear from Washington,' Scott returned, 'and the fire in front from the Mexicans.' U. S. Govt, Cong. 29, Ses. 1, Sen. Doc. 378, pp. 4-9.